2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The soil fungal community of native woodland in Andean Patagonian forest: A case study considering experimental forest management and seasonal effects

Abstract: Forest management can alter soil fungal communities which are important in the regulation of biogeochemical cycles and other ecosystem services. The current challenge of sustainable management is that management be carried out while preserving the bioecological aspects of ecosystems. Mixed Patagonian woodlands are subject to continuous disturbance (fire, wood extraction, and livestock), with unknown consequences for soil fungal communities. Our objective was to study the fungal community and the effects of an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 599 high-quality fungal OTUs obtained, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were the predominant phyla, comprising 88% of all identified fungi (Supplementary Materials Table S2). This slight taxonomic dominance in favor of Basidio-or Ascomycota in soil fungi, depending on the forest type or season, corroborates previous studies investigating forest soils [6,21,28,45,[73][74][75][76]. Ascomycota, the largest phylum of fungi [77], was also the most taxa-rich (49% OTUs) in our study, indicating its dominance in the studied mixed coniferous forest, with no differences observed between forest reserves and managed forests.…”
Section: Overall Taxa Richness and Diversity Of Trophic Groupssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the 599 high-quality fungal OTUs obtained, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were the predominant phyla, comprising 88% of all identified fungi (Supplementary Materials Table S2). This slight taxonomic dominance in favor of Basidio-or Ascomycota in soil fungi, depending on the forest type or season, corroborates previous studies investigating forest soils [6,21,28,45,[73][74][75][76]. Ascomycota, the largest phylum of fungi [77], was also the most taxa-rich (49% OTUs) in our study, indicating its dominance in the studied mixed coniferous forest, with no differences observed between forest reserves and managed forests.…”
Section: Overall Taxa Richness and Diversity Of Trophic Groupssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Unlike the numerous works concerning the effect of management on the forest mycobiome, only a few studies have addressed how fungi from different trophic groups recover from natural and anthropogenic disturbances and develop structural features typical of unmanaged old-growth forests [27][28][29][30]. An excellent reservoir of fungal diversity for several fungal functional guilds, i.e., group of species that exploit the same class of environmental resources in a similar way, as well as valuable testing grounds for comparisons between traditionally managed and unmanaged forests, is found in such diversified forms of protection as national parks, landscape parks, the Natura 2000 network, and forest reserves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is benefits improve crop performance (Liu et al, 2020b) had higher relative abundance in cress rotation under 80% SWC than in the control; however, the Ascomycota and Ilyonectria spp. which is potential pathogens (Carron et al, 2020) had higher in control than in the other treatments. Meanwhile, the relative abundance of guilds related to plant pathogens had no changed in single cress rotation under 100%, instead, it was reduced in the cress rotation under 80%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The groups of Udivitrands were dominant in the low productivity site with ocher color and poor abundance of roots. Soil chemical characteristics were similar between medium and low productivity sites but both poorer than the high productivity site (Carron et al 2020). Elevation across sites ranges from 790 to 840 m.…”
Section: Study Area and Experimental Sitesmentioning
confidence: 88%