2015
DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n1p397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sodomy II Trial: Does the Federal Court Set A New Precedent When Dealing with Government Expert Witness?

Abstract: On 10th February 2015, the highest Court in Malaysia, the Federal Court delivered its decision on an appeal made by a well

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…taken by the victim. The judgment's literal understanding shows that courts are now prepared to consider all sorts of expert testimony on its face value without the need to analyse the practical specifics of how the research process was performed (Muhamad & Rahamanickam, 2016). In Syed Abu Bakar bin Ahmad v PP, the Appellant was convicted of a public servant's criminal breach of trust of such funds entrusted to him.…”
Section: Expert Opinion In Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…taken by the victim. The judgment's literal understanding shows that courts are now prepared to consider all sorts of expert testimony on its face value without the need to analyse the practical specifics of how the research process was performed (Muhamad & Rahamanickam, 2016). In Syed Abu Bakar bin Ahmad v PP, the Appellant was convicted of a public servant's criminal breach of trust of such funds entrusted to him.…”
Section: Expert Opinion In Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%