2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Socratic Dialogue and teacher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of the tool as a frame in this instance created a space for the teachers to reflect on how their relationship worked -not simply in the broad generalisations of 'we get on' but in a more nuanced understanding of how the interaction functions drive the content of their conversation and how their tone and tempo reflect, support and shape their mutual learning. This detailed analysis of successful interaction is something that is rarely given time and space in any professional context, yet it is crucial to translating dialogic practice into new relationships and contexts (Knezic et al 2010).…”
Section: Case 4: Mary and Linzi -Sharing Good Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the tool as a frame in this instance created a space for the teachers to reflect on how their relationship worked -not simply in the broad generalisations of 'we get on' but in a more nuanced understanding of how the interaction functions drive the content of their conversation and how their tone and tempo reflect, support and shape their mutual learning. This detailed analysis of successful interaction is something that is rarely given time and space in any professional context, yet it is crucial to translating dialogic practice into new relationships and contexts (Knezic et al 2010).…”
Section: Case 4: Mary and Linzi -Sharing Good Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dialogue makes pre-service teachers go beyond their individual frames of reference and makes them consider new conceptions and knowledge about teaching (Knežić, Wubbels, Elbers, & Hajer, 2010).…”
Section: The Mentoring Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, teachers' personal knowledge, about themselves and their teaching, develops throughout their professional lives (Johnson & Golombek, 2002;Tsang, 2004). Drawing on these concepts of personal practical knowledge and 'person-centered education' (Cornelius- White, 2007), professional development has been increasingly focused on learning from practical experience and interpersonal sensitivity (Knezic, Wubbels, Elbers, & Hajer, 2010). Against this background, teachers' practical knowledge has been argued to be the actual driving force behind teachers' thinking and behavior (Borg, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teacher educators are considered education specialists, both as an expert and as a role model, and can be expected to possess practical knowledge specifically concerned with the communication of subject-related concepts to prospective teachers (Love, 2009). This focus has placed new challenges on teacher educators in terms of their professional progress (Knezic et al, 2010). In this study, we define teacher educators' language as that which is used in classroom communication to teach, speak, and interact about their professional topics, which as a consequence feeds into both student-teachers' and teachers educators' own learning process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%