Computer Supported Cooperative Work
DOI: 10.1007/1-84628-248-9_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sociolinguistics of SMS: An Analysis of SMS Use by a Random Sample of Norwegians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
109
0
12

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
13
109
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings on discoursal features clearly suggested that female students mostly wrote complex messages, and this feature was similar to Ling (2005) and Rafi (2008). Instead of making a simple message which contain single idea or thought, they put multiple thoughts in one message altogether.…”
Section: Message Complexitysupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings on discoursal features clearly suggested that female students mostly wrote complex messages, and this feature was similar to Ling (2005) and Rafi (2008). Instead of making a simple message which contain single idea or thought, they put multiple thoughts in one message altogether.…”
Section: Message Complexitysupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Text messaging is used for various purposes, from exchanging messages and keeping in touch with friends and families (Ling 2005, Al Rousan, Aziz & Christopher 2011, Thurlow 2003 because it connects people to others just by using a mobile device (Hashemi & Azizinehad 2012, Guthery & Cronin 2002. It is not only known to contribute in maintaining the daily life relationship between mates, friends, and family, but also engages those who are involved in academic circles such as students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has become an indispensable part of people's lives all over the world, and its amazing penetration is still growing. Texting is the preferred form of mediated interaction among young people, specifically youth, surpassing all other kinds of computer-mediated communication such as instant messaging, e-mail, voice mobile telephony and even land-line phones (Ling, 2005). Their low cost, their smaller size, their personal and private nature, and the introduction of the pre-paid phone cards have contributed significantly to the rapid adoption rate by young people (Faulkner & Culwin, 2005;Ling, 2005Ling, , 2008.…”
Section: Why Do Young People Use Text Messaging?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum length of an SMS message is 160 characters which means there is little material for content-based filtering. Due to the short message length available, SMS subscribers use an idiosyncratic language subset with abbreviations, phonetic contractions, bad punctuation, emoticons, etc., which is different to the more traditional written 4 language more typically used in emails (Kobus et al, 2008;Ling, 2005). It has also been shown that email spam filtering can be improved by including contextual information found in the email headers (Rennie, 2000;Zhang et al, 2004;Lai, 2007) but SMS messages contain far less information in the headers, which offers less context to work with.…”
Section: From Email To Sms Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%