The Sociobiologic Integrative Model (SBIM): Enhancing the Integration of Sociobehavioral, Environmental, and Biomolecular Knowledge in Urban Health and Disparities Research
Abstract:Disentangling the myriad determinants of disease, within the context of urban health or health disparities, requires a transdisciplinary approach. Transdisciplinary approaches draw on concepts from multiple scientific disciplines to develop a novel, integrated perspective from which to conduct scientific investigation. Most historic and contemporary conceptual models of health were derived either from the sociobehavioral sciences or the biomolecular sciences. Those models deriving from the sociobehavioral scie… Show more
“…26,[29][30][31] Although income was accounted for in this study, other sociodemographic inequalities and geographical variation among African Americans and whites may also play a role in confounding the survival discrepancies seen. 32,33 This study showed that African Americans did not receive equivalent interventions as frequently as their white counterparts (ie, decreased rates of radiotherapy and surgical resection). Various analyses have shown that African Americans tend to receive lower quality health care even after accounting for barriers to access, such as the lack of health insurance.…”
African Americans encounter death due to STS at a much larger proportion and faster rate than their respective white counterparts. African Americans frequently present with a larger size tumor, do not undergo surgical resection, or receive radiation therapy as frequently as compared with their white peers. Barriers to timely and appropriate care should be further investigated in this group of at-risk patients.
“…26,[29][30][31] Although income was accounted for in this study, other sociodemographic inequalities and geographical variation among African Americans and whites may also play a role in confounding the survival discrepancies seen. 32,33 This study showed that African Americans did not receive equivalent interventions as frequently as their white counterparts (ie, decreased rates of radiotherapy and surgical resection). Various analyses have shown that African Americans tend to receive lower quality health care even after accounting for barriers to access, such as the lack of health insurance.…”
African Americans encounter death due to STS at a much larger proportion and faster rate than their respective white counterparts. African Americans frequently present with a larger size tumor, do not undergo surgical resection, or receive radiation therapy as frequently as compared with their white peers. Barriers to timely and appropriate care should be further investigated in this group of at-risk patients.
“…Furthermore, our Hispanic category represents a heterogeneous population in terms of genetic background, culture, and duration of U.S. residence. In general, race/ethnicity serves as a marker for other genetic, exposure, and lifestyle factors [41]. Although we conjectured that racial/ethnic differences in screening rates for cancers before and after transplantation could have contributed to variation in cancer risk, we do not have data on cancer screening practices among transplant candidates or recipients.…”
Transplant recipients have elevated cancer risk, but it is unknown if cancer risk differs across race and ethnicity as in the general population. U.S. kidney recipients (N=87,895) in the Transplant Cancer Match Study between 1992 and 2008 were evaluated for racial/ethnic differences in risk for six common cancers after transplantation. Compared to white recipients, black recipients had lower incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 0.60, p<0.001) and higher incidence of kidney (aIRR 2.09, p<0.001) and prostate cancer (aIRR 2.14, p<0.001); Hispanic recipients had lower incidence of NHL (aIRR 0.64, p=0.001), and lung (aIRR 0.41, p<0.001), breast (aIRR 0.53, p=0.003) and prostate cancer (aIRR 0.72, p=0.05). Colorectal cancer incidence was similar across groups. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) measured the effect of transplantation on cancer risk and were similar for most cancers (p≥0.1). However, black and Hispanic recipients had larger increases in kidney cancer risk with transplantation (SIRs: 8.96 in blacks, 5.95 in Hispanics vs. 4.44 in whites), and only blacks had elevated prostate cancer risk following transplantation (SIR: 1.21). Racial/ethnic differences in cancer risk after transplantation mirror general population patterns, except for kidney and prostate cancers where differences reflect the effects of end-stage renal disease or transplantation.
“…Th is discrepancy in incidence may explain the absence of high-quality studies on ESCC in the Western world. Although tobacco use (and less so alcohol use) is more commonplace in these more endemic regions, there are several other factors, including genetic variations, socioeconomic disparities, dietary factors, and possibly infectious causes, that likely also contribute to the diff erences in incidence across countries ( 31 ).…”
There is a positive synergistic effect of alcohol and tobacco use for ESCC. The observed combined effect of the two factors is almost double if there were no synergy. Efforts for controlling the burden of ESCC should focus on individuals who use both alcohol and tobacco.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.