1982
DOI: 10.1525/ae.1982.9.2.02a00070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

the socialist transformation of agriculture in a Romanian commune, 1945‐62

Abstract: The Romanian socialist transformation of agriculture is analyzed as a sociopolitical process typical of complex society. Its specific character results from the interaction of national policy and local organization within a framework of regional power relations. National policy is transformed by community class relations, land use, and intracommunity variation as expressed in regional political economy. Local deviations promote change at national levels, thereby countering those who see collectivization solely… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, state distribu-tion systems and formal bureaucrat-ic procedures were transformed through extensive use of informal social networks, as documented by anthropologists of Central and Eastern Europe (e.g., Hann 1980and 1985, Kideckel 1982, Sampson 1986, Wedel 1986. The most important 'good' was typically information disseminated through informal networks based on trust: information about who, how, and where was the lifeblood of economic and political survival.…”
Section: Informal Groups Network and The Role Of The Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, state distribu-tion systems and formal bureaucrat-ic procedures were transformed through extensive use of informal social networks, as documented by anthropologists of Central and Eastern Europe (e.g., Hann 1980and 1985, Kideckel 1982, Sampson 1986, Wedel 1986. The most important 'good' was typically information disseminated through informal networks based on trust: information about who, how, and where was the lifeblood of economic and political survival.…”
Section: Informal Groups Network and The Role Of The Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rural complex was organized during the socialist period around industrially operated farms, either in state farms (IAS) or cooperatives of agricultural production (CAP). The modernization of agriculture took place through a long-term cooperativization program from 1949 to 1962, a policy considered almost inevitable in the context of agricultural underproduction, overpopulation, and the lack of mechanization [39]. This political decision was the answer to the problem of fragmentation of agricultural property.…”
Section: Network Alignment During the Planned Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members of the group carried out long-term field research in Romania in the 1970s following Ceaucescu's renunciation of the Soviet Union. Fieldwork included urban sites, and a focus on the workings of the state bureaucracy, demonstrating not only the heterogeneity of socialism but more generally the existence of different modernities (Cole, 1976;Kideckel, 1976Kideckel, , 1982Kideckel and Sampson, 1984;Sampson, 1984). These studies thus antedate several aspects of what was later grasped with the concept of multiple modernities developed in the 1990s (Eisenstadt, 2000).…”
Section: Anthropological Research On Socialismmentioning
confidence: 99%