2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2008.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The social value of public information with costly information acquisition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
52
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
52
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 In particular, Colombo and Femminis (2008) reach the opposite conclusion by allowing agents to choose the precision of private information given the precision of public information. They show that welfare necessarily increases with public information if the cost of the precision is linear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 In particular, Colombo and Femminis (2008) reach the opposite conclusion by allowing agents to choose the precision of private information given the precision of public information. They show that welfare necessarily increases with public information if the cost of the precision is linear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They give a sufficient condition guaranteeing that the former is positive whenever the latter is positive and show that the model of Colombo and Femminis (2008) satisfies the condition. Their condition is based upon a comparison between the equilibrium and the socially optimal strategy profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples include Colombo and Femminis (2008), Dewan and Myatt (2008), Hellwig andVeldkamp (2009), Hagenbach andKoessler (2010), and Myatt and Wallace (2012), in which underlying games are type +I or +II. However, private collection of information and aggregation of information may have di↵erent e↵ects on the expected payo↵ depending upon the types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AP characterize both the unique Bayesian Nash equilibrium and the socially optimal 1 Several authors challenge the anti-transparency result considering di↵erent methods of information dissemination. See Colombo and Femminis (2008), Cornand and Heinemann (2008), Myatt and Wallace (2010), and Arato and Nakamura (2012), among others. In contrast, James and Lawler (2011) strengthen MS's conclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%