1993
DOI: 10.1177/104973159300300304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Social Support Survey: A Validation Study of a Clinical Measure of the Social Support Process

Abstract: Social support is a complex process with far-reaching implications for social work practice. This article presents a practice model of the social supportprocess, detailing its four components (i. e., provider, recipient, interaction, and outcomes), and a measure of the social support process based on the practice model and developed for clinical use. The model and clinical assessment instrument should facilitate understanding the support process and developing client interven tion strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A χ 2 analysis supported the hypothesis that the remaining correlations between PASS-Q dimensions and SSS questions would generally be of lower magnitude. Further, like the SSS (Richman et al, 1993), the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List , and the Social Support Questionnaire (Sarason, Levine, Basham, & Sarason, 1983), all four PASS-Q dimensions were not signi cantly correlated with ratings of social desirability. With the exception of the tangible support dimension in Study 1, Cronbach's alpha internal reliability coef cients and the composite reliabilities all exceeded .70.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A χ 2 analysis supported the hypothesis that the remaining correlations between PASS-Q dimensions and SSS questions would generally be of lower magnitude. Further, like the SSS (Richman et al, 1993), the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List , and the Social Support Questionnaire (Sarason, Levine, Basham, & Sarason, 1983), all four PASS-Q dimensions were not signi cantly correlated with ratings of social desirability. With the exception of the tangible support dimension in Study 1, Cronbach's alpha internal reliability coef cients and the composite reliabilities all exceeded .70.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the SSS was developed as a clinical assessment tool in the context of social work (Richman, Rosenfeld, & Hardy, 1993) and not designed for the sporting context, the SSS has been used in sport psychology research. The SSS assesses eight types of social support: emotional support, listening support, emotional challenge, task appreciation, task challenge, reality con rmation, tangible assistance, and personal assistance.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rosenfeld et al (1989) examined the diVerential provision of support from coaches, teammates, friends and parents. However, validation of the Social Support Survey (Richman et al, 1993) does not reveal whether all eight dimensions of support can be clearly separated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Interpersonal Support Evaluation List can yield a total score, but also consists of four support dimension subscales. The Social Support Survey (Richman et al, 1993) is yet more diVerentiated, consisting of eight dimensions, developed from the sixdimensional conceptualization of support proposed by Pines et al (1981). In the present study of tennis players, it seems reasonable to suggest that certain people may provide diVerent types of social support to the individual in diVerent circumstances.…”
Section: Social Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the concurrent and criterion-related validity of the SSS, Richman et al (1993) provided evidence of correlations between individual SSS items and a loneliness measure and alternative measures of social support, all drawn from general (social) psychology. Using small samples, there was evidence for only some significant relationships, and there was no evidence of relationships between any of the four-item content factors and the criterion measures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%