2005
DOI: 10.4102/hts.v61i1/2.441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The social setting of Jesus’ exaltation in Luke-Acts (Lk 22:69 and Ac 7:56)

Abstract: This article presents a model for "intercultural exegesis" and applies this model to Luke 22:69 and Acts 7:56. In this process, the term "Son of Man" is approached from two perspectives: that of a biblical culture in the first century Graeco-Roman world, and that of a current Christian culture in Africa. The study concludes that the "Son of Man" concept in the selected texts not only includes a reference to the eschatological saviour, judge and defender, but also creates a sense of Jesus' solidarity with his f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this perspective, African context and people are not used just as a field of applying 'exegetical' conclusions, but they stand as the subject of interpretation, equipped with genuine epistemological privilege. Though Matand (1998) and Cilumba (2001) still maintain a distance between the 'exegesis' of the text and its contextualization (or hermeneutic), studies from Manus (2003) and Loba-Mkole (2005b;2006a;2006b) support Ukpong's view in integrating African context/people as one of the active components of intercultural hermeneutics/exegesis/mediation. However, this diversity of opinion can be regarded as a healthy tension between the practitioners of intercultural biblical dialogue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From this perspective, African context and people are not used just as a field of applying 'exegetical' conclusions, but they stand as the subject of interpretation, equipped with genuine epistemological privilege. Though Matand (1998) and Cilumba (2001) still maintain a distance between the 'exegesis' of the text and its contextualization (or hermeneutic), studies from Manus (2003) and Loba-Mkole (2005b;2006a;2006b) support Ukpong's view in integrating African context/people as one of the active components of intercultural hermeneutics/exegesis/mediation. However, this diversity of opinion can be regarded as a healthy tension between the practitioners of intercultural biblical dialogue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cilumba (2001) and Chris U. Manus (2003). The present author has previously contributed to intercultural biblical exegesis, also viewing it as intercultural mediations (Loba-Mkole 2005a, 2005b. The first section of this article briefly presents different trends of biblical exegesis in Africa, while the second one deals with different phases of intercultural exegesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can apply to sacred or non-sacred texts. An intercultural biblical construction is based on three frames of reference: original biblical cultures, ecclesial cultures and target contemporary cultures (Loba-Mkole 2005a, b:291-326, 2010:125, 2012:37, 2016:254, 2019a, 2019b.…”
Section: Mapping the Intercultural Biblical Hermeneuticsmentioning
confidence: 99%