1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1298(199807/08)8:4<261::aid-casp490>3.0.co;2-c
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
The social responsibility of gamete providers
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
8
1
1
0
Citation Types
1
8
0
0
Year Published
2001
2014
Publication Types
Select...
9
Relationship
0
9
Authors
Journals
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
References 33 publications
1
8
0
0
“…While they were aware that a child born through their contribution would inevitably inherit some of their genetic traits, each participant was comfortable with the fact that she shared a genetic and familial history with her sister and that the child or children produced through her donation would inevitably reflect traits and characteristics that could be attributed to their shared familial history or to her brother-in-law's family. In fact, consistent with the claims of those who maintain that children produced from third-party reproduction have a right to information about their genetic origins and family health history (Blyth, 1998;Daniels, 1998), the women in this study were relieved to know that this information would be readily available to their niece or nephew, because of the social and familial history they shared with their sister.…”
Section: Predonation Preparation
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…While they were aware that a child born through their contribution would inevitably inherit some of their genetic traits, each participant was comfortable with the fact that she shared a genetic and familial history with her sister and that the child or children produced through her donation would inevitably reflect traits and characteristics that could be attributed to their shared familial history or to her brother-in-law's family. In fact, consistent with the claims of those who maintain that children produced from third-party reproduction have a right to information about their genetic origins and family health history (Blyth, 1998;Daniels, 1998), the women in this study were relieved to know that this information would be readily available to their niece or nephew, because of the social and familial history they shared with their sister.…”
Section: Predonation Preparation
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…These concerns, combined with the pragmatic reality that the demand for eggs far outweighs the available supply, have been instrumental in influencing many clinics and countries to favor anonymous egg donation-an option that is also rife with ethical dilemmas but is less problematic in terms of boundary ambiguity (Daniels, 1998;McShane, 1997;Robinson, 1995). In fact, many fertility clinics now restrict or severely limit the use of known egg donors, prohibiting family members from donating eggs to help a sibling produce a child because of fears about long-term adjustment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been an increasing voice among professionals that gamete donors (and by extrapolation GCS) have a social responsibility (21). This social responsibility demands that third party reproduction participants consider the rights and needs of the offspring on the basis of their participation.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the interests of the donation parties may not be limited to medical factors. Psychosocial (Golombok et al, 2011) and social (Daniels, 1998) factors will have to be taken into consideration to fully weight benefits a GEDR can produce. However, this cannot be fully discussed in the context of this manuscript.…”
Section: Implementing Beneficent Practices
mentioning
confidence: 99%
