2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2016.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The social production of design space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the design space is not merely cognitive but is also formed by e.g. the shapes and functions of objects and materials (van Amstel et al, 2016). However, even though prior research about the difficulties of innovation and innovative design has acknowledged materiality to some extent, materiality is described as a passive receiver of social structures or as a set of unproblematic givens.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…That is, the design space is not merely cognitive but is also formed by e.g. the shapes and functions of objects and materials (van Amstel et al, 2016). However, even though prior research about the difficulties of innovation and innovative design has acknowledged materiality to some extent, materiality is described as a passive receiver of social structures or as a set of unproblematic givens.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Here, researchers focus on the design space, i.e. the possibilities and constraints that determine what can be designed or not (van Amstel et al, 2016). Hence, this concept share many similarities with the concepts mentioned in the previous section.…”
Section: 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From this perspective, collaboration is not one thing, but it will have different configurations in different situations for different players (Bardram 1998). Collaboration emerges when the collection of individuals in the situation interact to resolve misunderstandings around multiple interpretations of what makes collaboration in the situation (Van Amstel et al 2016) (Table 6).…”
Section: Resolving Misunderstandings According To the Socio-constructmentioning
confidence: 99%