2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The social pain of Cyberball: Decreased pupillary reactivity to exclusion cues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the behavior results showed that participants felt less pleasant on social rejection trials in both high-and low-levels empathy groups. Social rejection induced unpleasant experience at the behavioral level, replicating previous findings that individuals reported feeling more excluded, distressed and unhappier when observing being rejected than being accepted in the Cyberball Task or the Chatroom Interact Task [17,18]. However, subjective ratings didn't reveal marked significance in two groups, suggesting that no matter the level of empathy, individuals perceive the social pain in social rejection task.…”
Section: B Erp Datasupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As expected, the behavior results showed that participants felt less pleasant on social rejection trials in both high-and low-levels empathy groups. Social rejection induced unpleasant experience at the behavioral level, replicating previous findings that individuals reported feeling more excluded, distressed and unhappier when observing being rejected than being accepted in the Cyberball Task or the Chatroom Interact Task [17,18]. However, subjective ratings didn't reveal marked significance in two groups, suggesting that no matter the level of empathy, individuals perceive the social pain in social rejection task.…”
Section: B Erp Datasupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Furthermore, the included studies do not study participants’ actual behavior, which may differ from their (retrospective) reports on their emotional responses. Although this approach may represent the most commonly used design to assess the effects of social exclusion, more objective parameters (e.g., neurocognitive correlates 21 ; psychophysiological reactions 22 ; endocrinological effects 23 ) have been studied and demonstrate that the effects are also present on a biological level that may reflect a more immediate response to social exclusion. In addition, the Cyberball paradigm may be seen in a more complex sense than as an experimental tool to measure the effects of social exclusion on an individual level: it can be presumed that besides acting as individuals aiming to fulfill their individual needs, the players also represent a group, which automatically strives to meet and regulate specific social group norms, such as equality between group members (“equality norm”).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ball reception or interventions, respectively) must also occur frequently in a cyberball game. In the exclusionary cyberball, physiological responses to recurring relevant events (here: ball reception) change within an experimental block over time [47]. A corresponding decrease of the P3 amplitude [28] can be related to a re-adjustment of subjective expectancies [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%