2018
DOI: 10.1111/aman.13158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Social Network of US Academic Anthropology and Its Inequalities

Abstract: Anthropologists often call attention to the problems posed by social inequality, but academic anthropology also reproduces many of the very inequalities that its practitioners work to critique. Past research on US academic hiring networks has shown evidence of systematic inequality and hierarchy, attributed in significant part to the influence of academic prestige, which is not necessarily a reflection of merit or academic productivity. Using anthropology departments’ websites, we gathered information on all t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This demands greater attention to what Michel‐Rolph Trouillot (2003, 8) poignantly appraised as the “electoral politics” of the discipline. Nicholas Kawa, José Michelangeli, Jessica Clark, Daniel Ginsberg, and Christopher McCarty (2019) provide a sobering appraisal of the discipline in their research article “The Social Network of US Academic Anthropology and Its Inequalities.” Drawing on a comprehensive data set that includes all tenured and tenure‐track faculty in doctoral anthropology programs in the United States, the authors utilize social network analysis to delineate patterns of inequality and reciprocity in the placement of anthropology PhD graduates. The findings are striking, yet unsurprising: “In US academic anthropology, a small cluster of programs is responsible for producing the majority of tenured and tenure‐track faculty in PhD‐granting programs, with a very select few dominating the network” (Kawa et al.…”
Section: Against the Decolonial Fix: Toward An Abolitionist Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This demands greater attention to what Michel‐Rolph Trouillot (2003, 8) poignantly appraised as the “electoral politics” of the discipline. Nicholas Kawa, José Michelangeli, Jessica Clark, Daniel Ginsberg, and Christopher McCarty (2019) provide a sobering appraisal of the discipline in their research article “The Social Network of US Academic Anthropology and Its Inequalities.” Drawing on a comprehensive data set that includes all tenured and tenure‐track faculty in doctoral anthropology programs in the United States, the authors utilize social network analysis to delineate patterns of inequality and reciprocity in the placement of anthropology PhD graduates. The findings are striking, yet unsurprising: “In US academic anthropology, a small cluster of programs is responsible for producing the majority of tenured and tenure‐track faculty in PhD‐granting programs, with a very select few dominating the network” (Kawa et al.…”
Section: Against the Decolonial Fix: Toward An Abolitionist Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings are striking, yet unsurprising: “In US academic anthropology, a small cluster of programs is responsible for producing the majority of tenured and tenure‐track faculty in PhD‐granting programs, with a very select few dominating the network” (Kawa et al. 2019, 23) 19 . Their invaluable contribution provides an overdue reminder that the epistemological crisis of anthropology is also one of professional reproduction that remains overdetermined by an elite cast of anthropologists.…”
Section: Against the Decolonial Fix: Toward An Abolitionist Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Presently, almost 80 percent of those receiving doctorates in anthropology do not get tenure track positions in departments of anthropology (Speakman et al 2018). Moreover, those who do get tenure track positions almost exclusively graduated from a subset of universities such as Harvard and the University of Chicago (Kawa et al 2018).…”
Section: Current Trends In Employment and Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%