The social life of technicalities: ‘Terrorist’ lives in Delhi’s courts

Abstract

How do we imagine the place of courtrooms in relation to society? There have been two dominant ways that ethnographers have viewed trials. The first treats trials as ways of understanding social structures and political power. In relation to terrorism trials, the courtroom becomes the arena in which nationalist politics can be re-enacted. There is the space of a pre-existing society—with all its hierarchies and conflicts—and the court case is then merely affixed to the social. The second way, which has a minor role in scholarship on India, has imagined courtrooms as theatrical spaces in which society is discursively constructed. In this article, I argue that an ethnography of courtrooms can be a way of accessing the space of courtroom on its own terms. I argue that the technologies of law set in place their own relations and forms of sociality and that the courtroom is a world in and of itself. Based on an ethnography of terrorism trials in Delhi, I show how the terrorism trial is not only the arena in which bigger contestations over nationalism and religious identity may play out; it is also the space in which new forms of life specific to the courtroom emerge.

Make believe: Police accountability, lying and anti-blackness in the inquest of Sean Rigg

“…Treating the transcript as part of the legal case-file making process (Suresh, 2022; van Oorschot, 2021; Vismann, 2008), I read the accounts less strictly as verbatim of the Court and more as citations of a text. In this way, I examined the transitions between different claims, the multiplicity of the voice and the ambiguity of truth/fiction, as it was said and heard on the level of accountability.…”

Reescrevendo a decisão do caso Charu Khurana and Others v. Union of India and Others para o Projeto Indiano de Julgamentos Feministas: Algumas Reflexões

“…O julgamento em uma sala de audiência é um locus privilegiado para se verificar como o Direito constitui sua verdade (BAXI, 2014). Nesse processo de constituição da verdade, as pessoas que decidem e que advogam, as partes e o grupo maior de indivíduos presentes no complexo da Corte -todos imaginam o tribunal simultaneamente em dois níveis: como uma extensão da sociedade e como espaços em que a sociedade é produzida (Suresh, 2019). organizado com base no princípio da "visibilidade da justiça mais que em sua audibilidade" (BAXI, 2014).…”

Rewriting Charu Khurana and Others v. Union of India and Others for the Indian Feminist Judgments Project: Some Reflections

“…The trial in a courtroom is a privileged site where we may trace how the law constitutes its truth (BAXI, 2014). In this process of constituting truth, the judge, the advocates, the parties of the case and the larger group of persons present in the court complex -all imagine courtroom simultaneously at two levels, as an extension of society and also as spaces where society is produced (SURESH, 2019).…”