2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The social impact of pathogen threat: How disease salience influences conformity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
135
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
18
135
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that the societal implications of parasite stress (and the societal implications of famine) are distinct from the implications of other variables that might also affect individual fitness and mortality. This conclusion is consistent also with psychological evidence showing that, while other threats can also influence individuals' conformist and ethnocentric attitudes, the perceived threat of infectious disease has effects that are empirically unique and, often, especially powerful [13], [14], [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results suggest that the societal implications of parasite stress (and the societal implications of famine) are distinct from the implications of other variables that might also affect individual fitness and mortality. This conclusion is consistent also with psychological evidence showing that, while other threats can also influence individuals' conformist and ethnocentric attitudes, the perceived threat of infectious disease has effects that are empirically unique and, often, especially powerful [13], [14], [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…At a psychological level of analysis, empirical evidence reveals that the subjective perception of infection risk causes individuals to be more conformist, to prefer conformity and obedience in others, to respond more negatively toward others who fail to conform, and to endorse more conservative socio-political attitudes [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. At a societal level of analysis, empirical evidence reveals that in countries and cultures characterized by historically higher prevalence of parasitic diseases, people are less individualistic, exhibit lower levels of dispositional openness to new things, are more likely to conform to majority opinion, and more strongly endorse "binding" moral values that emphasize group loyalty, obedience, and respect for authority [15], [16], [17], [18], [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even at the turn of the century, Kurzban and Leary (2001) observed, "although parasites may play a critical role in the evolutionary process, they have received little attention in terms of their power to drive human psychological adaptations" (p. 197). However, more recently the implications of parasitic threat for human psychology have been demonstrated across several domains, including attention (Miller & Maner, 2012), emotion (Oaten, Stevenson, & Case, 2009), prejudice and person perception (e.g., Faulkner, Schaller, Park, & Duncan, 2004), conformity (Murray & Schaller, 2012;Wu & Chang, 2012), and interpersonal behavior in general (Mortensen, Becker, Ackerman, Neuberg, & Kenrick, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, dispositionally germ-averse individuals report more restrictive sexual attitudes when the threat of disease is made immediately salient (Murray, Jones, & Schaller, 2013). Other laboratory experiments reveal higher behavioral and attitudinal conformity when the threat of disease is experimentally made salient (Murray & Schaller, 2012;Wu & Chang, 2012).…”
Section: Neurocognitive Processesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Park et al 2007;Wu and Chang 2012). The questionnaire measures two internally consistent subscales; an eight-item Germ Aversion (GA) subscale measures emotional discomfort in situations where potential pathogen exposure is high, and a seven-item Perceived Infectability (PI) subscale measures belief about one's resistance to infection.…”
Section: Measurement Of Chronic Disease Concernmentioning
confidence: 99%