Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) 2016
DOI: 10.18653/v1/p16-2096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Social Impact of Natural Language Processing

Abstract: Medical sciences have long since established an ethics code for experiments, to minimize the risk of harm to subjects. Natural language processing (NLP) used to involve mostly anonymous corpora, with the goal of enriching linguistic analysis, and was therefore unlikely to raise ethical concerns. As NLP becomes increasingly wide-spread and uses more data from social media, however, the situation has changed: the outcome of NLP experiments and applications can now have a direct effect on individual users' lives.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
204
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
204
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethical considerations are established as essential part in planning mental health research and most research projects undergo approval by an ethics committee. On the contrary, the computational linguistics community has started only recently to consider ethical questions (Hovy and Spruit, 2016;Hovy et al, 2017). Likely, this is because computational linguistics was traditionally concerned with publicly available, impersonal texts such as newspapers or texts published with some temporal distance, which left a distance between the text and author.…”
Section: Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ethical considerations are established as essential part in planning mental health research and most research projects undergo approval by an ethics committee. On the contrary, the computational linguistics community has started only recently to consider ethical questions (Hovy and Spruit, 2016;Hovy et al, 2017). Likely, this is because computational linguistics was traditionally concerned with publicly available, impersonal texts such as newspapers or texts published with some temporal distance, which left a distance between the text and author.…”
Section: Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likely, this is because computational linguistics was traditionally concerned with publicly available, impersonal texts such as newspapers or texts published with some temporal distance, which left a distance between the text and author. Conversely, recent social media research often deals with highly personal information of living individuals, who can be directly affected by the outcomes (Hovy and Spruit, 2016).…”
Section: Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, demographic factors do create a demographic bias in the training data that influences NLP tools like POS taggers (Jørgensen et al, 2015;Hovy and Søgaard, 2015), leading to possible exclusion of under-represented demographic groups (Hovy and Spruit, 2016). Current methods, however, still fail to explicitly account for such biases, and can in fact even increase the demographic bias (Zhao et al, 2017).…”
Section: Debiasing and Other Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recently noted by Hovy and Spruit (2016), there has been "little discourse in the [NLP] community" about ethics, and the social impact of natural language processing. Their paper opens up the discussion, and provides some useful terminology, which can be summarized as follows:…”
Section: Bias and Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%