1985
DOI: 10.1016/0047-2352(85)90042-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The social ecology of homicide: A modified lifestyle/routine activities perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Homicide, a prime example of violence, has been previously studied using routine activity theory. 1922 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Homicide, a prime example of violence, has been previously studied using routine activity theory. 1922 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homicide, a prime example of violence, has been previously studied using routine activity theory. [19][20][21][22] In Guatemala, all three elements of routine activities theory are active around pay days. There are motivated offenders due to poor socioeconomic conditions as well as an active and organised criminal infrastructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,[6][7][8] Homicide, the prime example of criminal violence, has been studied using routine activity theory in several research efforts. [9][10][11][12] Suicide, while not criminal, is also a violent act that may be better understood through the use of routine activity theory. However, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no application of routine activity theory to the study of suicide.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lifestyle/routine activity theory has been widely explored in studying the differential risks of victimization in the United States and other Western countries ( Andromachi et al 2004 ;Bernburg and Thorlindsson 2001 ;Cass 2007 ;Cohen et al 1981 ;Debra 1993 ;Forde and Kennedy 1997 ;Jackson et al 2006 ;Kanan and Pruitt 2002 ;Kennedy and Forde 1990 a ;1990 b ;Massey and McKean 1985 ;Miethe et al 1987 ;Mustaine and Tewksbury 1998 ;1999;Osgood et al 1996 ;Spano and Nagy 2005 ;Tewksbury and Mustaine 2001 ).…”
Section: Theory and Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%