1996
DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Social Ecology of Health Promotion: Implications for Research and Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
168
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 315 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
168
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Policies which target a number of di erent levels within society (eg. community, school, family, individual) referred to as social ecological approaches (Stokols et al; are increasingly advocated as being more e ective in delivering bene cial changes in diets (Gentile et al;. Experience in reducing the prevalence of smoking also points to an approach which does not rely entirely on price increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policies which target a number of di erent levels within society (eg. community, school, family, individual) referred to as social ecological approaches (Stokols et al; are increasingly advocated as being more e ective in delivering bene cial changes in diets (Gentile et al;. Experience in reducing the prevalence of smoking also points to an approach which does not rely entirely on price increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data that capture these factors would provide a more comprehensive understanding of health disparities and offer insight into the causes of health disparities. For example, although ample individual-level research confirms that poorer populations generally have worse health care quality and access than higher income groups, only a wider perspective can reveal the impact of living in neighborhoods that have more health-damaging opportunities (e.g., fast-food chains and liquor stores) than health-promoting resources (e.g., supermarkets and parks) (Sallis, Kraft, & Linton, 2002;Schulz et al, 2001;Schulz et al, 2002;Stokols, Allen, & Bellingham, 1996;Zenk et al, 2005). Beyond offering a better understanding of the causes for disparities, contextual analyses are applicable to designing effective interventions.…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this study focused on the intrapersonal and interpersonal factors that influence coping strategies, findings can best advance change by also engaging environmental and policy contexts to help strengthen mental health for young women in the NWT, suggesting the importance of a social ecological perspective [38]. Many participants acted as interpersonal supports for other young people, providing safety and shelter for friends in need, especially when family members were using alcohol or during periods of family violence.…”
Section: Conclusion and Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%