The Social Costs in Communication Hiccups Between Native and Nonnative Speakers

Abstract

It is well-established that native speakers perceive nonnative speakers with strong foreign accents, compared to those with a more nativelike accent, as less intelligent and competent, less ambitious and dependable as co-workers, and less comfortable around native speakers. But little is known about how nonnative speakers themselves are affected when communication hiccups-often due to incorrect or accented pronunciations-occur in their conversations with native speakers. In this experiment, mispronunciations of an English word were elicited from native Chinese speakers in phone conversations via the Internet with an American English speaker, who then either asked for clarification of the word or showed no confusion about the word but asked about something else. Chinese speakers' reactions were measured using a combination of self-reports, facial affective coding, and skin conductance responses.When the American asked for clarification-compared to when he did not-Chinese speakers were left feeling more anxious, embarrassed, and unsure of their English abilities, as well as feeling less positive about the American, finding him less attractive socially and their conversation with him less enjoyable.

Does International Status Affect Competence Ratings in Newly Formed Multinational Teams? The Role of Psychological Safety Growth and Verbal Behavior

“…Other studies use terms such as expatriates and host country nationals (Mol et al, 2005; Tung, 1998), or natives and non-natives (Neeley, 2013; Russo et al, 2017). Regardless of the label used, the distinction is common in research, as it provides a measurable and theoretically relevant way of understanding status differences between people (Au et al, 2017; Castilla, 2008; Tröster et al, 2014).…”

Native and Non-native Speakers of English in TESOL

“…The extent and frequency of use of the strategies can vary within a conversation, shaped by changing awareness of a partner's needs (Hwang et al, 2015); speakers may both converge on and diverge from each other's use of English at different points and in different, perhaps contradictory, ways. Beliefs about group identity (for example 'people like us' versus 'foreigners') has been shown to influence understanding/task achievement (Neuliep, 2013) and prejudicial beliefs about 'other people' can result in a perception of difficulty in understanding them (Hansen and Dovidio, 2016), as well as in perceptions of lower intelligence and competence generally (Au et al, 2017). In other words, in addition to ontologies of the language itself, actual 'successful' uses of English depend partly on a nesting of perceptions about the current task, beliefs about your own and another person's identity, your own and other's relational goals, and the outcome of your interaction (Wang, 2013).…”