2013
DOI: 10.1086/671053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Social Context of Temporal Sequences: Why First Impressions Shape Shared Experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the fact that employees may have become visible later on for the mystery shoppers, however, a first impression that an employee was visible was obviously enough to contribute to higher satisfaction scores. This aspect is consonant with the notion that first impressions are particularly likely to have an impact on overall assessments of an object, even if additional information is obtained later on in the individual's interaction with the object (Bhargave & Montgomery, ). Given that the absence of an employee is relatively more negatively charged than the presence of an employee, it is also consonant with the notion that negative first impressions are more difficult to change than positive first impressions (cf.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Despite the fact that employees may have become visible later on for the mystery shoppers, however, a first impression that an employee was visible was obviously enough to contribute to higher satisfaction scores. This aspect is consonant with the notion that first impressions are particularly likely to have an impact on overall assessments of an object, even if additional information is obtained later on in the individual's interaction with the object (Bhargave & Montgomery, ). Given that the absence of an employee is relatively more negatively charged than the presence of an employee, it is also consonant with the notion that negative first impressions are more difficult to change than positive first impressions (cf.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…For example, consumers make different choices when they are shopping with another person versus alone (Kurt, Inman, and Argo 2011), when their choices are public versus private (Ariely and Levav 2000;Ratner and Kahn 2002), when they observe others' consumption choices before choosing (McFerran et al 2010), and when they intend to consume products publicly (Berger and Ward 2010;Graeff 1998). They also evaluate products differently when they compare others' decisions to their own (Dahl, Argo, and Morales 2012) and when they share the consumption experience with others (Bhargave and Montgomery 2013). We suggest that consumers' choices may be affected not only by the people who are actually accompanying them but also by the people who are only figuratively accompanying them, in their minds.…”
Section: Decision Making In a Social Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, greater interpersonal interaction increases feelings of interdependence (Ashton‐James et al, ) during the interval and, also later, when the target sequence is evaluated retrospectively. Additionally, recent research has found that experiences that take place in a socially connected context facilitate a more holistic processing style, similar to that induced by a simple self‐construal prime (Bhargave & Montgomery, ). Because semantic self‐construal primes (e.g., exposure to “I”/“my” versus “we”/“our”) have been shown to be very powerful in altering individuals' prevailing self‐construal and, in some instances, have elicited effects consistent with those produced by actual social context (e.g., presence of others), the majority of research in this domain has manipulated processing style in this manner.…”
Section: The “End Effect” In Temporal Sequences Researchmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this paper, we conceptualize social connection as the extent to which people feel associated with others when experiencing or retrieving a temporal sequence. Research on self‐construal has found that people feel more socially connected by actually interacting with other people (Ashton‐James, van Baaren, Chartrand, Decety, & Karremans, ; Bhargave & Montgomery, ) or simply by thinking about experiences that involve others, even when no one else is present (Gardner, Gabriel, & Lee, ; Kühnen & Oyserman, ). For example, some employees may feel highly socially connected because of the nature of their jobs (e.g., regularly on conference calls or in meetings).…”
Section: The “End Effect” In Temporal Sequences Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%