2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The social context of change in tobacco consumption following the introduction of ‘smokefree’ England legislation: A qualitative, longitudinal study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because smoke-free legislation physically separates smokers from non-smokers by requiring smokers to smoke outside, it has been suggested that smoke-free legislation may increase feelings of stigmatization (Gottlieb et al, 1992). Several qualitative studies found that smoke-free legislation in workplaces and public places is associated with feelings of stigmatization (Gottlieb et al, 1992;Hargreaves et al, 2010;Poland, 1998;Ritchie et al, 2010a, 2010band Thompson et al, 2007. In these studies, smokers report that they feel 'like a leper' (Ritchie et al, 2010b), 'an outcast' (Thompson et al, 2007), or 'ashamed' (Baha and Le Faou, 2010) when they have to go outside to smoke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because smoke-free legislation physically separates smokers from non-smokers by requiring smokers to smoke outside, it has been suggested that smoke-free legislation may increase feelings of stigmatization (Gottlieb et al, 1992). Several qualitative studies found that smoke-free legislation in workplaces and public places is associated with feelings of stigmatization (Gottlieb et al, 1992;Hargreaves et al, 2010;Poland, 1998;Ritchie et al, 2010a, 2010band Thompson et al, 2007. In these studies, smokers report that they feel 'like a leper' (Ritchie et al, 2010b), 'an outcast' (Thompson et al, 2007), or 'ashamed' (Baha and Le Faou, 2010) when they have to go outside to smoke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies (except one) reported a reduction in consumption after policies were put in place. Hargreaves et al [40] found that smoke-free legislation reduced consumption amongst smokers because of the potential inconvenience of going outside, and their increased visibility as a smoker which they perceived led to public disapproval. Studies have also found that the introduction of smoke-free legislation leads to reductions in exposure to SHS in the workplace, restaurants, bars and public places.…”
Section: Smoke-free Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In China, workplaces with a smoking ban have smoking prevalence 18% lower (55.5% vs. 73.3%) than workplaces that only restrict smoking (Gao, Zheng, Gao, Chapman, & Fu, 2011). Other benefits include the decrease in cigarette consumption (Hargreaves et al, 2010;Hopkins et al, 2010) and a reduction in the percentage of heavy smokers (≥25 cigarettes/day) (Hopkins et al, 2010). Furthermore, voluntary bans at home have also been found to decrease cigarette consumption among smokers (Mills, Messer, Gilpin, & Pierce, 2009).…”
Section: Tobacco Consumption and Cessationmentioning
confidence: 99%