1992
DOI: 10.1002/sce.3730760507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Social Construction of Scientific Concepts or the Concept Map as Device and Tool Thinking in High Conscription for Social School Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
107
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
107
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Through constructing a group concept map, group members explain their views and knowledge to one another about a topic. The group members also negotiate and develop collaboratively the meanings they would add to their concept maps [10], [11].…”
Section: A Collaborative Concept Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through constructing a group concept map, group members explain their views and knowledge to one another about a topic. The group members also negotiate and develop collaboratively the meanings they would add to their concept maps [10], [11].…”
Section: A Collaborative Concept Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely acknowledged that mathematics instruction often prevents meaningful learning and does not give students an opportunity to understand mathematical concepts and to critically and freely reflect on relationships between ideas (Boaler, 1997). Roth and Roychoudhury (1992) have pointed out that even though instruction may attempt to show connections, textbooks and teachers can never provide all possible connections. Besides, no matter how many formulations there are and how explicit they are, students will always have to construct their own ways of expressing the relationship between pairs of concepts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a map is a model of reality, one needs to understand the map's context in order to appropriately interpret how it represents that reality. The map externalises only a part of an individual's thoughts (Roth & Roychoudhury, 1992). It is possible to get a fuller picture of a student's learning if we consider a concept map as a product that depends highly on the contexts of its production: the individuals who produced it, and who they are and where they come from: their learning histories, and the mathematical opportunities and resources to which they have access.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, however, in the processes of teaching and learning where we encounter the vast majority of literature in this field. The first research was carried out at the end of the eighties and the beginning of the nineties (Daley; Shaw; Balistrieri; Glasenapp; Piacentine, 1999; Markham; Mintzes; Jones, 1994; Roth; Roychoudhury, 1992Roychoudhury, , 1993 More specifically, in the study and use of concept maps for learning, we will consider three main lines of work, all of which can be traced back explicitly to the theory of meaningful learning created by Ausubel (1963). Each line of work uses one kind of map which is given a name and has specific characteristics.…”
Section: Theoretical Groundwork In Concept Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%