2011
DOI: 10.1080/21567069.2011.624995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The social construction of educational technology through the use of authentic software tools

Abstract: A major strand of science and technology studies in recent decades has related to the social construction of technology (SCOT) movement, whose adherents maintain that technological systems are determined just as much by social forces as by technological ones. Taking this SCOT notion as a starting point, and putting a focus on the user, this paper looks at some examples of the educational use of software tools that exploit the functionality of the software in ways far removed from the original design. Examples … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While technological determinism is not currently a prevailing view among scholars in this area (Jones & Bissell, ), it endures as a strongly held perspective among certain groups (Wyatt, ). Determinism continues to be an influential perspective for understandable reasons.…”
Section: Technological Determinismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While technological determinism is not currently a prevailing view among scholars in this area (Jones & Bissell, ), it endures as a strongly held perspective among certain groups (Wyatt, ). Determinism continues to be an influential perspective for understandable reasons.…”
Section: Technological Determinismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data was collected through focus group interviews with 38 students randomly selected out of the 106-student cohort. The data was analysed using a sociology of education technology perspective (Jones & Bissell, 2011;Oliver, 2013;Selwyn, 2012), wherein we examined the data not for exploring how the app 'acted upon' the students, but rather how the students constructed the app as suitable or otherwise for their learning needs (Oliver, 2013). Such a study enables us to highlight how educational technologies are not introduced into a learning scenario that is a tabula rasa ripe to be acted upon; rather, they are introduced into complex social learning environments (Chan, Walker, & Gleaves, 2015) in which students have expectations, desires and anxieties that should be acknowledged by educators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature review: the case for a sociology of educational technologies Sociology of education technology scholarship critiques the dominant 'technological determinist' approach to educational technologies. Through a technological determinist lens, educational technologies are perceived as 'acting upon' student cohorts (Jones & Bissell, 2011;Kear, Jones, Holden, & Mark, 2016;Oliver, 2011;Selwyn, 2012;Selwyn & Facer, 2014;Webster, 2013). Such an approach presumes that the agency to effect change is broadly in the hands of technologies that can coerce students into learning, if only they are set up appropriately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These theoretical perspectives come largely from the field of social studies of technology -an area which is has only recently been applied to educational technology (Jones & Bissell, 2011;Selwyn & Facer, 2014;Selwyn, 2012;Walker & Creanor, 2009). The paper provides a brief overview of the theoretical perspectives, and then presents and discusses the three exemplars.…”
Section: What Should Educators Consider When Introducing Social Technmentioning
confidence: 99%