2021
DOI: 10.5465/annals.2019.0036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Social and Relational Dynamics of Absenteeism From Work: A Multilevel Review and Integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
63
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 192 publications
7
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, future research should utilize scientific assessments and adopt a combined study design to examine the relationships and mechanism of interaction between presenteeism and its antecedents and outcomes. What is also significant both in nurse presenteeism practice and theory is to explore the social context of presenteeism and possible spill over dynamics occurring across levels and domains ( 25 ). A clear understanding of the underlying factors of presenteeism would allow for the development of scientific and robust strategies to help prevent and to reduce presenteeism among nurses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, future research should utilize scientific assessments and adopt a combined study design to examine the relationships and mechanism of interaction between presenteeism and its antecedents and outcomes. What is also significant both in nurse presenteeism practice and theory is to explore the social context of presenteeism and possible spill over dynamics occurring across levels and domains ( 25 ). A clear understanding of the underlying factors of presenteeism would allow for the development of scientific and robust strategies to help prevent and to reduce presenteeism among nurses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, previous literature has shown that organizational context plays an important role in presenteeism, and a supportive work climate tends to reduce the tendency of presenteeism ( 25 , 26 ). For example, Wang et al ( 46 ) found that the contextual factor leader-member exchange was positively related to presenteeism by increasing employees' approach motivation of presenteeism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, an ill employee may stay home but essentially work a full day remotely, representing another hybrid behavior, perhaps labeled "remote presenteeism." Acknowledging this range of possible behaviors, Miraglia and Johns (2020) note that presenteeism "represents a much-occupied but only recently studied state between being absent (and ostensibly exhibiting no productivity) and fully productive work engagement" (p. 261).…”
Section: Absenteeism Presenteeism and Everything In Betweenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers view these phenomena as connected (e.g., Caverley et al, 2007 ; Bierla et al, 2013 ; Deery et al, 2014 ; Garrow, 2016 ) not only because of their high statistical correlation ( Johns, 2010 ), but also because both attendance behaviors relate to the employees’ health (e.g., Demerouti et al, 2009 ; Hansen and Andersen, 2009 ; Janssens et al, 2013 ; Skagen and Collins, 2016 ). Further, they have a major economic impact for organizations due to reduced productivity ( Collins et al, 2005 ; Iverson et al, 2010 ; Warren et al, 2011 ; Vanni et al, 2017 ) and disruption of work processes ( Gosselin et al, 2013 ; Strömberg et al, 2017 ; Miraglia and Johns, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of empirical studies has focused on the identification of correlates of the attendance phenomena (e.g., Johns, 2011 ; Miraglia and Johns, 2016 , 2021 ) while little research has been done to understand the individual’s psychological processes leading to the decision to attend work or not in case of illness ( Gosselin, 2018 ). Interestingly, sickness absenteeism and sickness presenteeism research has mainly developed along parallel paths although the phenomena are the result of a complex decision-making process that rules out the other alternative ( Johns, 2010 ; Halbesleben et al, 2014 ; Lohaus and Habermann, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%