“…The majority of authors found that individuals aggregated in larger groups when travelling and at sleeping sites, while foraging and resting seemed to take place in smaller groups (Boese, ; Dunbar & Nathan, ; Galat‐Luong, Galat, Hagell, & Tuttle, ; Sharman, , but see Bert et al, ; Dupuy & Gaillard, ). Moreover, a number of authors reported OMU‐like subgroups as the smallest entities (Boese, ; Galat‐Luong et al, ; Sharman, ); however, it remained unclear whether these OMUs represent reproductive units as in hamadryas baboons (Kummer, ). Based on observations collected from captive Guinea baboons, Maestripieri, Mayhew, Carlson, Hoffman, and Radtke () assumed the existence of OMUs, while Sharman () conducted nearest‐neighbor analyses and found that females tended to associate most frequently with juveniles and other females.…”