2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism

Abstract: We review the evidence from a number of surveys in which our NetLab has been involved about the extent to which the Internet is transforming or enhancing community. The studies show that the Internet is used for connectivity locally as well as globally, although the nature of its use varies in different countries. Internet use is adding on to other forms of communication, rather than replacing them. Internet use is reinforcing the pre‐existing turn to societies in the developed world that are organized around … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
349
0
19

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 500 publications
(397 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
349
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…While there has been a shift to conceptualising community in terms of individualised networks rather than groups (Frith, 2012;Wellman et al, 2003), others have questioned whether the network concept is too restrictive to understand contemporary sociality (Sheller, 2004;Wittel, 2001). Wellman's (2001, p. 227) description of network societies hints at this as he describes how "boundaries are permeable, interactions are with diverse others, connections switch between multiple networks, and hierarchies can be flatter and recursive".…”
Section: Gelling Socialitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While there has been a shift to conceptualising community in terms of individualised networks rather than groups (Frith, 2012;Wellman et al, 2003), others have questioned whether the network concept is too restrictive to understand contemporary sociality (Sheller, 2004;Wittel, 2001). Wellman's (2001, p. 227) description of network societies hints at this as he describes how "boundaries are permeable, interactions are with diverse others, connections switch between multiple networks, and hierarchies can be flatter and recursive".…”
Section: Gelling Socialitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We explore how neighbourhood arises in new ways (Kempen & Wissink, 2014) in tourism. Drawing on studies which explore whether technology has weakened, reinforced or supplemented forms of local connection (Fortunati, Taipale, & de Luca, 2013;Hampton, Lee, & Her, 2013;Ohnmacht, 2009;Sheller, 2004), we argue that the rise in networked individualism (Wellman et al, 2003) has reinforced the importance of place for personal networks (Frith, 2012;Hampton 2016;Wellman et al, 2003). We explore how mobile connectivity might enhance forms of community in a tourism setting through maintaining social ties both near and at a distance, and bridging to individuals outside our social sphere, an area that has received little attention in research (Wilken, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Social capital is derived from belonging to communities, though new forms of virtual community have evolved (Wellman et al, 2003) with implications for access to forms of support (Hampton, 2016). Belonging to a community is not always positive for all and can lead to restricted access to certain resources (Julien, 2014).…”
Section: Lift-share Trust and Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on work by Wellman (see Wellman, et al, 2003), Castells has used the term 'networked individualism' to describe the form of sociality in such societies. Networked individualism relates to the way social relations are realized in interaction between on-line and off-line social networks and to a move from physical communities to personalized or privatized virtual networks.…”
Section: Networked Individualism and Networked Socialitymentioning
confidence: 99%