1993
DOI: 10.2307/3712138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Social Adaptation of Marginal Religious Movements in America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any group departing from the status quo on claims of moral principle runs the risk of giving this impression. Marginal religious movements elicit resistance by threatening notions about how people ought to live (see Nancy Tatum Ammerman’s testimony in the case of the Waco Branch Davidians, 1993), and by calling into question, in their behavior and structure, the legitimacy of established values (Harper & Le Beau, 1993). Even if the actual morality of their choice is debatable, the very fact that do-gooders claim to base their behavior on moral grounds is an implicit indictment of anyone taking a different path, because moral dictates are by definition universal (Frankena, 1973, p. 25) and apply to everyone (Turiel, 1983, p. 36).…”
Section: Anticipated Moral Reproachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any group departing from the status quo on claims of moral principle runs the risk of giving this impression. Marginal religious movements elicit resistance by threatening notions about how people ought to live (see Nancy Tatum Ammerman’s testimony in the case of the Waco Branch Davidians, 1993), and by calling into question, in their behavior and structure, the legitimacy of established values (Harper & Le Beau, 1993). Even if the actual morality of their choice is debatable, the very fact that do-gooders claim to base their behavior on moral grounds is an implicit indictment of anyone taking a different path, because moral dictates are by definition universal (Frankena, 1973, p. 25) and apply to everyone (Turiel, 1983, p. 36).…”
Section: Anticipated Moral Reproachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In America and England, by conS trast, the Church is an outsider. The American Church is an immigrant institution in an historically Protestant culture, and up until the 1960s at least, enjoyed little public legitamacy (see Harper and LeBeau 1993). The Catholic Church in England is in the shadow of the formally established Protestant church (Hornsby-Smith 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study's first hypothesis assumes that, as argued by Harper and LeBeau (1993), in countries where the Church is an outsider it is confronted with greater external pressure to legitimate its institutional structure and practicesv This means that the American and English bishops, relative to their Polish and Irish counterparts, are likely to make a stronger attempt to present the Church as a "normal" political actor accommodative of secular issues (see Cook, Jelen, and Wilcox 1992: 10). One way of achieving this goal is to pay greater attention to scientific reasoning, and another is to acknowledge the autonomy of legislation from Catholic morality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But scholars, such as Kevin Christiano, William Swatos, and Peter Kivisto, restrict its uses by modem social scientists in academic literature, calling it an ethical breach (Christiano et al 2002, p. 11). As such, terms, such as alternative religious movements, emergent religions, marginal religious movements, and new religious movements (NRMs), have been suggested to take the place of cult (Harper and Le Beau 1993). Despite the critiques leveled against the use of the term, this study finds cult useful to explain the Majimaji situation and how local religion, Christianity, and Islam are intertwined in matters of violence and the remedying of the German colonialism in Tanzania.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%