2006
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2006.884058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The (SmZr)Co$_3$Phase in Sm(CoFeCuZr)$_rm z$Magnets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fe x Cu 0.08 Zr 0.03 ) 8.2 (x = 0.23, 0.26, and 0.28) as-cast alloys 21 . According to the chemical composition, the Zr-rich phase can be shortened in form of (SmZr) 1 (CoFeCu) 3 , which is in accord with the results of Campos 22 . Furthermore, it can be seen that the content of Zr in Zr-rich 1:3 phase increases with the increase of the Fe content, which indicates that the addition of Fe tends to promote the segregation of Zr in 1:3 phase.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Fe x Cu 0.08 Zr 0.03 ) 8.2 (x = 0.23, 0.26, and 0.28) as-cast alloys 21 . According to the chemical composition, the Zr-rich phase can be shortened in form of (SmZr) 1 (CoFeCu) 3 , which is in accord with the results of Campos 22 . Furthermore, it can be seen that the content of Zr in Zr-rich 1:3 phase increases with the increase of the Fe content, which indicates that the addition of Fe tends to promote the segregation of Zr in 1:3 phase.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…6. The 1:3 phase has been described as Rhombohedral Sm 1 Zr 2 Co 9 , a stable phase in the ternarium Sm-Zr-Co, with structure derived from PuNi 3 [30][31][32], see Table 1. The X-ray spectra of the 820°C sample and 400°C sample are very similar, both with $7% of nanocrystalline Sm(CuCu) 5 phase (crystallite size $12 nm), 3% of 1:3 and all the rest 2:17R (crystallite size $50 nm provided best fitting in the Rietveld analysis).…”
Section: Microstructural Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result can be attributed to the presence of grains of Zr-rich impurity phases [9], which are presumably softer and generate stray fields that could provoke magnetic reversal of the 2:17 nanograins. Microstructural analysis was carried out to determine the nature of these impurity phases [6,7,9]. The results obtained from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [9] indicated the presence of several phases with the sum Sm+Zr ranging from 15 to 25 at%.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [9] indicated the presence of several phases with the sum Sm+Zr ranging from 15 to 25 at%. Rietveld analysis of X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra [6,7] was then employed, and the results from both SEM and Rietveld XRD are summarized as follows.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation