2009
DOI: 10.1080/00927870902829049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Smooth Representations of GL2(𝔒)

Abstract: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the construction of split regular representations of prefixGL2false(orfalse) appealed to Hill's construction [, Theorem 4.6]. Since Takase has realised that this construction does not produce all the split regular representations, one should view the construction of the current paper as superseding that of , while at the same time unifying the split regular case with the cuspidal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the construction of split regular representations of prefixGL2false(orfalse) appealed to Hill's construction [, Theorem 4.6]. Since Takase has realised that this construction does not produce all the split regular representations, one should view the construction of the current paper as superseding that of , while at the same time unifying the split regular case with the cuspidal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let l = ⌈ r 2 ⌉ and l ′ = ⌊ r 2 ⌋, so that r = l + l ′ . To any π ∈ Irr(G r ), we associate its G l ′ -conjugacy orbit in M 2 (O l ′ ); see for example [30]. First note that if the orbit of π is scalar mod p, it means that the twist isoclass of π contains an imprimitive representation.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green [9] calculated the characters of the irreducible representations of GL n (O 1 ). Several authors, for instance, Frobenius [6], Rohrbach [23], Kloosterman [15,16], Tanaka [30], Nobs and Wolfart [21], Nobs [20], Kutzko [17], Nagornyȋ [18], and Stasinski [27] studied the representations of the groups SL 2 (O ) and GL 2 (O ). Nagornyȋ [19] obtained partial results regarding the representations of GL 3 (O ) and Onn [22] constructed all the irreducible representations of the groups G ( 1 , 2 ) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%