2012
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2011.048215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The small population of PIG-A mutant cells in myelodysplastic syndromes do not arise from multipotent hematopoietic stem cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In AA and PNH, GPI‐AP deficient cells in arise from a multipotent HSC; PIG‐A mutations in these patients are clonal and affect all hematopoietic lineages, including T cells. In contrast, GPI‐AP deficient cells that can be detected either in healthy controls or patients with MDS arise from colony forming cells (CFC); the PIG‐A mutations in these individuals are transient, non‐clonal, and do not involve T cells . These studies demonstrate fundamental differences between AA and MDS and help explain why PNH may arise from AA but not from MDS.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Pnh Testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In AA and PNH, GPI‐AP deficient cells in arise from a multipotent HSC; PIG‐A mutations in these patients are clonal and affect all hematopoietic lineages, including T cells. In contrast, GPI‐AP deficient cells that can be detected either in healthy controls or patients with MDS arise from colony forming cells (CFC); the PIG‐A mutations in these individuals are transient, non‐clonal, and do not involve T cells . These studies demonstrate fundamental differences between AA and MDS and help explain why PNH may arise from AA but not from MDS.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Pnh Testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These studies demonstrate fundamental differences between AA and MDS and help explain why PNH may arise from AA but not from MDS. Furthermore, in healthy controls the PIG‐A mutation rate in CFC assays was demonstrated to be about 1 in 50,000 (∼ 0.002%) while that of PNH RBC phenotypes is 2–6 per million (i.e., 0.002–0.006%) in fresh PB of normal individuals. Thus, for diagnostic purposes, a threshold of 0.01%, which represents a level about 5–10X above that ever detected in healthy controls appears to be clinically reasonable threshold to define a disease‐related PNH clone .…”
Section: Interpretation Of Pnh Testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The culture dishes were scored for BFU-Es under an inverted phase contrast microscope and reported as an average of the 3 dishes in BFU-E per 1 × 10 5 nucleated cells. Colony identification was performed with greater than 50 cells identified as a BFU-E (Pu, Hu et al 2012). As this was performed as a standardized assay in a CLIA certified lab, only enumeration of the colonies was performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jeśli do mutacji dochodzi w komórkach na wyższym poziomie rozwoju, na przykład jednostek tworzących kolonie (CFU, colony forming unit), jak ma to miejsce u zdrowych osób i niektórych pacjentów z MDS, to ze względu na brak możliwości samoodtwarzania defektywny klon zanika [7,32,33]. W związku z częstym występowaniem klonu PNH u chorych na AA zaczęto od poszukiwania związku między tymi dwiema chorobami.…”
Section: Klasyfikacja Z Uwzględnieniem Historii Naturalnej Chorobyunclassified