2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The small pelagic fishery of the Pemba Channel, Tanzania: What we know and what we need to know for management under climate change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, data recorders were known to lack capacity/knowledge to identify and group fish species in their respective categories, leading to inaccuracies in recording the catches of small pelagics (sardines and anchovies), for example [78,79]. This makes the available historical data uncertain and their use problematic [80,81].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, data recorders were known to lack capacity/knowledge to identify and group fish species in their respective categories, leading to inaccuracies in recording the catches of small pelagics (sardines and anchovies), for example [78,79]. This makes the available historical data uncertain and their use problematic [80,81].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such ecosystem changes can lead to changes in fish composition and cause shifts in the distribution of certain species [15][16][17]. The most notable effects of El Niño on the fisheries, particularly the pelagic fishery, are changes in the latitudinal and vertical distribution of species, size structure, reproductive processes and an overall decline in landings [80]. These are expected to lead to an increase in fisher migration, a shift in the distribution of target species and associated loss of revenues, further affecting fishers' livelihoods and food security.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many marine animals' planktonic phases have been directly supported by phytoplankton, the second most important food source for small pelagic fish after zooplankton (Bachiller andIrigoien 2015, Abdellaoui et al 2017). In Tanzania, phytoplankton and small pelagic fish abundances are mainly controlled by different predominant oceanic processes (Sekadende et al 2020a, which are influenced by two seasonal monsoon wind systems, the northeast (NE) monsoon which runs from November to March, and the southeast (SE) monsoon season from May to September (Mahongo and Shaghude 2014). Phytoplankton and small pelagic fish composition, abundance and distribution vary greatly between the two seasons (Kizenga 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trap and seine net fisheries, for example, are frequently dominated by herbivorous fishes (e.g., [64][65][66]), which tend to respond to habitat and/or benthic processes [65,67,68]. However, given their intrinsically strong relationship with total fish productivity, planktivore sweet spots are likely to be disproportionally important for many reef-based fisheries [35][36][37][38]. Nevertheless, it is conceivable that seascapes that feature favourable conditions for both plankton subsidy and herbivore sweet spots will offer maximised yield opportunities for tropical reef fisheries.…”
Section: Plos Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While "optimal rewards" are context dependent [25,27], locations that concentrate target fish biomass production (Fig 1B ) will likely also support increased yields (or profit) relative to the rest of the seascape [26,28,30,31]. Plankton inputs, for example, tend to drive planktivorous and predatory fish aggregations in suitable habitats [11,22,23,32,33], with potential flow-on effects for important coastal and reef fisheries [34][35][36][37][38]. But how common are these "sweet spots" of fish concentration, both globally and locally, and what is the role of spatial subsidies in shaping their occurrence?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%