1966
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(66)80069-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The small intestinal basic electrical rhythm (slow wave) frequency gradient in normal men and in patients with a variety of diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
41
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
8
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amplitude and frequency of the pacesetter potential is entirely compatible with previous studies (Daniel, Carlow, Wachter, Sutherland, and Bogoch, 1958;Christensen, Schedl, and Clifton, 1966). The overall 30% spontaneous motility in the fasted state in the 25 patients studied is much lower than previously reported (Cummins, 1954;Code, Rogers, Schlegel, Hightower, and Bargen, 1957;Daniel et al, 1958) and this may be due to the non-obstructing effect of the open-tip catheter technique which enables resting activity to be recorded.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The amplitude and frequency of the pacesetter potential is entirely compatible with previous studies (Daniel, Carlow, Wachter, Sutherland, and Bogoch, 1958;Christensen, Schedl, and Clifton, 1966). The overall 30% spontaneous motility in the fasted state in the 25 patients studied is much lower than previously reported (Cummins, 1954;Code, Rogers, Schlegel, Hightower, and Bargen, 1957;Daniel et al, 1958) and this may be due to the non-obstructing effect of the open-tip catheter technique which enables resting activity to be recorded.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Ultrastructurally, the ICC of the human stomach have typical features (50) and have close contact with smooth muscle cells and nerve varicosities (17) very similar to the rat and mouse (26,43). The electrical pacemaker activities in both human (16) and mouse (6,14) stomach and human (9) and mouse (36) small intestine are not fully elucidated but at this point do not appear to be fundamentally different. Hence, the rat and mouse appear to be suitable models to gain insight into human gastroduodenal motility (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aborad to this point, there is a diminishing slow-wave frequency gradient along the small bowel to a rate of 14 cpm in the distal ileum [5,23]. In humans, slow waves in the duodenum and proximal jejunum occur at about 12 cpm with an aborad gradient to about 9 cpm in the terminal ileum [24,25]. Whether a proximal plateau of identical frequencies is present in the human duodenum and proximal jejunum has not been clearly shown [24].…”
Section: Small Intestinal Myoelectrical Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%