2016
DOI: 10.5006/2137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Slow Strain Rate Stress Corrosion Cracking Test—A 50 Year Retrospective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
43
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 269 publications
0
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as the most aggressive potential is reached, there is a significant and important difference between the time for crack initiation and the time for failure data. Specifically, the ranking of the HEAC susceptibility of the materials heats based on their time to failure (a common SSRT metric [21]) is not consistent with the ranking obtained when using the time to crack initiation (which is more relevant to the true HEAC susceptibility). For example, despite being considered one of the more HEAC-resistant heats of Monel K-500 [42,43] based on the traditional SSRT metrics, NRL HS is found to exhibit a similar time to crack initiation as the EAC-susceptible NRL LS and TR2 material heats.…”
Section: Implications For the Interpretation Of Ssrt Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, as the most aggressive potential is reached, there is a significant and important difference between the time for crack initiation and the time for failure data. Specifically, the ranking of the HEAC susceptibility of the materials heats based on their time to failure (a common SSRT metric [21]) is not consistent with the ranking obtained when using the time to crack initiation (which is more relevant to the true HEAC susceptibility). For example, despite being considered one of the more HEAC-resistant heats of Monel K-500 [42,43] based on the traditional SSRT metrics, NRL HS is found to exhibit a similar time to crack initiation as the EAC-susceptible NRL LS and TR2 material heats.…”
Section: Implications For the Interpretation Of Ssrt Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…low-cost, efficient, modular, simple to perform, etc. [18,21,22,108]). Moreover, it is likely that there are environment/material/loading combinations for which the SSRT remains a useful screening approach.…”
Section: Implications For the Interpretation Of Ssrt Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, ratios in the range of 0.8-1.0 denote a high resistance to SCC, whereas low values (i.e. <0.5) indicate a high susceptibility [29][30][31]. The features of the fracture surfaces were investigated using a HIROX-3000 digital optical microscope (OM) and a JEOL JSM 6610LV scanning electron microscope (SEM) fitted with a tungsten electron gun, operated with an 15 kV accelerating voltage and a working distance of about 10 mm.…”
Section: Post-test Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Welded tensile specimens (MAG, SAW, RPEB) showed slightly lower TTFR and RAR values. However, according to acceptance criteria reported in the literature [29][30][31], the values still remained sufficiently high (≥0.70) to assume a reasonably high resistance to SCC.…”
Section: Post-test Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%