2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The slow decline of the Galactic recurrent novae T Pyxidis, IM Normae, and CI Aquilae

Abstract: A distinguishing trait of the three known Galactic recurrent novae with the shortest orbital periods, T Pyx, IM Nor, and CI Aql, is that their optical decline time-scales are significantly longer than those of the other recurrent systems. On the other hand, some estimates of the mass of the ejecta, the velocity of the ejecta, and the duration of the soft X-rays emission of these systems are of the order of those of the other recurrent systems and the fast classical novae. We put forth a tentative explanation o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, estimates of their ejecta masses, ejection velocities and soft-X-ray runoff times are comparable to other recurrent novae and fast classical novae. This led Caleo & Shore (2015) to propose that their slower optical declines can be explained as gas which is transferred into the Roche lobe of the WD by the donor star in the first few days of the nova explosion, blocking the radiation from ionizing the ejecta and increasing the optical decline timescale. Whether or not this explains their distinctive slow declines requires further exploration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, estimates of their ejecta masses, ejection velocities and soft-X-ray runoff times are comparable to other recurrent novae and fast classical novae. This led Caleo & Shore (2015) to propose that their slower optical declines can be explained as gas which is transferred into the Roche lobe of the WD by the donor star in the first few days of the nova explosion, blocking the radiation from ionizing the ejecta and increasing the optical decline timescale. Whether or not this explains their distinctive slow declines requires further exploration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%