The sliding wear behaviour of steels with the same hardness

Zambrano, O.A.; Gómez, Juan Carlos Osorio; Coronado, J.J.; Rodríguez, S.A.

doi:10.1016/j.wear.2018.12.002

Cited by 39 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The same test was used to weight loss evaluation of the sample consist of the Cr-Mn-Si steel and the thermos analysis during the test was conducted [ 9 ]. Steel of the different microstructure but the same hardness was evaluated by Zambrano et al [ 10 ] in block on ring test and the calculated wear coefficient showed a pronounced dependence with the yield strength of the steel.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Experimental Study of Abrasive, Mechanical and Corrosion Effects in Ring-on-Ring Sliding Contact

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents the application of the ring-on-ring test to investigate some of the important factors affecting the abrasive and corrosion wear of a face seal used in the sugar industry. The test involves the sliding contact between two steel rings working in different conditions such as mechanic, abrasive, corrosive extortions and its combination. Rings were made of the C45 steel and the surface layers were modified by heat and thermochemical treatment such as normalizing, flame hardening, nitriding and chrome diffusion. Maximum wear of the sample after tests under mechanic, abrasive and corrosion extortion were obtained. For C45 steel without surface modification the biggest wear was obtained for mechanical, abrasive and corrosive extortion and equals 0.0138 g. This value was three times bigger than the result for the mechanical extortion and ten times than for the corrosive conditions. For individual research options the percentage increase or decrease in wear resistance in relation to the normalized surface layer was determined. In the corrosive extortion the highest increase (90%) of wear resistance was recorded for the chrome layer relative to normalizing sample. The main conclusion of the paper is that the wear effect caused by all factors—mechanical, abrasive and corrosive—is not a straight sum of values of wear.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Experimental Study of Abrasive, Mechanical and Corrosion Effects in Ring-on-Ring Sliding Contact

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the information about the steel wear properties examined for a wider group of commercial materials is limited. For example, Zambrano et al [16] investigated the sliding wear resistance of selected steels (AISI 5160, AISI 1045 and AISI O1). However, the tested group of materials presents the same hardness or in another work [9] investigated and compared the abrasive resistance of only the austenitic steel group (grades FeMnAlC steel, AISI 316L and Hadfield steel).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Abrasion Resistance of S235, S355, C45, AISI 304 and Hardox 500 Steels with Usage of Garnet, Corundum and Carborundum Abrasives

Szala¹,

Szafran²,

Macek³

et al. 2019

Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The steel presents a wide field of application. The abrasive wear resistance of steel relies mainly on the microstructure, hardness as well as on the abrasive material properties. Moreover, the selection of a abrasion-resistant grade of steel still seems to be a crucial and unsolved problem, especially due to the fact that the actual operating conditions can be affected by the presence of different abrasive materials. The aim of this work was to determine the effect of different abrasive grit materials i.e. garnet, corundum and carborundum on the abrasive wear result of a commonly used in industry practice steels i.e. S235, S355, C45, AISI 304 and Hardox 500. The microstructure of the steel was investigated using light optical microscopy. Moreover, hardness was measured with Vickers hardness tester. Additionally, the size and morphology of the abrasive materials were characterized. The abrasion tests were conducted with the usage of T-07 tribotester (dry sand rubber wheel). The results demonstrate that the hardness and structure of steels and hardness of abrasive grids influenced the wear results. The abrasive wear behavior of steels was dominated by microscratching and microcutting wear mechanisms. The highest mass loss was obtained for garnet, corundum, and carborundum, respectively. The usage of various abrasives results in different abrasion resistance for each tested steel grade. The AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel presents an outstanding abrasive wear resistance while usage of corundum and Hardox 500 while using a garnet as abrasive material. The C45 carbon steel was less resistant than AISI 304 for all three examined abrasives. The lowest resistance to wear in garnet and carborundum was obtained for the S235JR and S355J2 ferritic-perlitic carbon steels and in corundum for Hardox 500 which has tempered martensitic structure.

show abstract

“…Losing the effective support matrix form of the enamel layer cannot make stability exist in the worn surface of the tested steel at the same time because of the effect of external load making the enamel layer of the worn surface of the tested steel quickly break and flake, thus unable to effectively slow down the effect of matrix wear, unlike in repeated sintering where it peels off. The sintering process leads to loss of substrate material due to the increasing degree of tested steel wear again [22,23,24,25].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Temperature on the Tribological Properties of NM600 under Sliding Wear

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An investigation on the tribological properties of GCr15 sliding against NM600 was carried out using a high-temperature friction and wear tester. As the temperature rose from room temperature to 300 °C, the average friction coefficient of NM600 increased rapidly, then decreased rapidly, and then became stable. The wear volume and specific wear rate of NM600 increased rapidly, then decreased rapidly, and then increased slowly. The wear mechanism and matrix properties of the tested steel at different temperatures are the main reasons for the above results. At 20–50 °C, the main wear mechanism was adhesive wear, fatigue wear, and abrasive wear. At 100–150 ℃, the wear mechanism was mainly adhesive wear, fatigue wear, abrasive wear, and oxidation wear. At 200–300 °C, the wear mechanism was mainly oxidation wear and abrasive wear.

show abstract

The sliding wear behaviour of steels with the same hardness

Cited by 39 publications

References 15 publications

Experimental Study of Abrasive, Mechanical and Corrosion Effects in Ring-on-Ring Sliding Contact

Experimental Study of Abrasive, Mechanical and Corrosion Effects in Ring-on-Ring Sliding Contact

Abrasion Resistance of S235, S355, C45, AISI 304 and Hardox 500 Steels with Usage of Garnet, Corundum and Carborundum Abrasives

Effects of Temperature on the Tribological Properties of NM600 under Sliding Wear

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About