2010
DOI: 10.1177/1748895809360964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sleep of (criminological) reason: Knowledge—policy rupture and New Labour’s youth justice legacy

Abstract: For over a decade, three successive New Labour administrations have subjected the English youth justice system to a seemingly endless sequence of reforms. At the root of such activity lies a core tension between measured reason and punitive emotion; between an expressed commitment to ‘evidence-based policy’ and a populist rhetoric of ‘tough’ correctionalism. By engaging a detailed analytical assessment of New Labour’s youth justice programme, this article advances an argument that the trajectory of policy has … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ellison and Smyth, 2000;Gormally et al, 1993;Tomlinson, 2012) A great deal of literature has focussed on the developments in the youth justice system in England throughout the 1990s, which were marked by policy hyperactivity that brought greater numbers of young people into the system (e.g. Goldson, 2010).…”
Section: Legacies Of the Past Influences On The Present Nicola Carr mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ellison and Smyth, 2000;Gormally et al, 1993;Tomlinson, 2012) A great deal of literature has focussed on the developments in the youth justice system in England throughout the 1990s, which were marked by policy hyperactivity that brought greater numbers of young people into the system (e.g. Goldson, 2010).…”
Section: Legacies Of the Past Influences On The Present Nicola Carr mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the government appears to be pursuing policies that appear to be diametrically opposed to the evidence presented. This is not a new phenomenon as Goldson (2010) noted in relation to youth justice.…”
Section: Listening To the Evidencementioning
confidence: 85%
“…The 'resignation' of some young people to offend given constrained opportunities as a result of criminal justice contact, in particular, further emphasised the negative impact of labelling processes which hold young people back from moves towards desistance. Goldson (2010) has similarly highlighted these counter-productive tendencies suggesting the complete removal of the child from the criminal justice system: Perhaps removing children and young people from the reach of the youth justice system altogether, by significantly raising the age of criminal responsibility, comprises the most effective diversionary strategy (Goldson, 2010: 163).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%