2012
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sizes, masses and specific star formation rates of massive galaxies at 1.3 < z < 1.5: strong evidence in favour of evolution via minor mergers

Abstract: We report the results of a comprehensive study of the relationship between galaxy size, stellar mass and specific star-formation rate (sSFR) at redshifts 1.3 < z < 1.5. Based on a mass complete (M 6×10 10 M ), spectroscopic sample from the UKIDSS Ultradeep Survey (UDS), with accurate stellar-mass measurements derived from spectrophotometric fitting, we find that at z 1.4 the location of massive galaxies on the sizemass plane is determined primarily by their sSFR. At this epoch we find that massive galaxies whi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
123
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
8
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also the conclusion of several studies in this field (e.g., Lopez-Sanjuan et al 2012;Huang et al 2013;Kaviraj et al 2013;McLure et al 2013;Fritz et al 2014) and is broadly in agreement with more recentmodels where minor mergers and secular evolution may play more important roles in galaxy evolution in the past 1/2 of the Hubble time (e.g., Guo & White 2008;Parry et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is also the conclusion of several studies in this field (e.g., Lopez-Sanjuan et al 2012;Huang et al 2013;Kaviraj et al 2013;McLure et al 2013;Fritz et al 2014) and is broadly in agreement with more recentmodels where minor mergers and secular evolution may play more important roles in galaxy evolution in the past 1/2 of the Hubble time (e.g., Guo & White 2008;Parry et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is consistent with the idea that compact SFGs are formed from extended SFGs, which are mostly disk dominated at low z, by increasing their central densities. The evolution toward disk-like morphologies with progressively bigger cores is consistent with the prominence of disks with bulges among massive SFGs at z 1  , as reported in previous works (e.g., Bruce et al 2012Bruce et al , 2014aBuitrago et al 2013;McLure et al 2013;Mortlock et al 2013;Lang et al 2014;Huertas-Company et al 2015). Note that rejuvenation and/or the re-growth of a star-forming disk in compact SFGs is also a possibility, although the increasing number of quiescent galaxies with time suggests that the net flow of galaxies is preferentially toward compaction and quenching.…”
Section: Galaxy Morphologies In the Sfrsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Naab et al 2009;Lotz et al 2011;Oser et al 2012;McLure et al 2013). Therefore, an evolutionary scenario in which major mergers at earlier epochs give rise to a population of initial S0s, that later minor mergers can evolve into different dynamical systems is quite plausible (e.g., the scenario proposed by Sil'chenko et al 2012, to explain the age and metallicity properties of S0 galaxies).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%