2021
DOI: 10.1002/rsa.20995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The size‐Ramsey number of short subdivisions

Abstract: The r-size-Ramsey numberR r (H) of a graph H is the smallest number of edges a graph G can have such that for every edge-coloring of G with r colors there exists a monochromatic copy of H in G. For a graph H, we denote by H q the graph obtained from H by subdividing its edges with q − 1 vertices each. In a recent paper of Kohayakawa, Retter and Rödl, it is shown that for all constant integers q, r ≥ 2 and every graph H on n vertices and of bounded maximum degree, the r-size-Ramsey number of H q is at most (log… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• There are several ways to improve the bound for f (H, q) in the proof of Theorem 1. In particular, one can use the constructions of Ramsey graphs for subdivisions given in [8,5]. In addition, it is possible to take k = ∆(Γ), where Γ is the Ramsey graph used, and M = 2|E(Γ)| + f 1 (q, k).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• There are several ways to improve the bound for f (H, q) in the proof of Theorem 1. In particular, one can use the constructions of Ramsey graphs for subdivisions given in [8,5]. In addition, it is possible to take k = ∆(Γ), where Γ is the Ramsey graph used, and M = 2|E(Γ)| + f 1 (q, k).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pnp 2 q " np by the assumption on p, one can expect that the -th neighbourhood of each vertex v P N 1 v 1 contains almost all vertices in both N 1 v `1 and N 1 v t´ `1 . A minor modification of [12,Corollary 2.5] gives precisely this. Namely, it shows that there exists a vertex v P N 1 v 1 such that, for all but ε|N 1 v `1 | vertices w P N 1 v `1 , there exists a path from v to w (in G) with one vertex in each of N 1 v 2 , .…”
Section: Trees and Cycles Through Prescribed Setsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As false(np2false)np$(np^2)^\ell \gg np$ by the assumption on p$p$, one can expect that the $\ell$th neighbourhood of each vertex vNv1$v \in N_{v_1}^{\prime }$ contains almost all vertices in both Nv+1$N_{v_{\ell +1}}^{\prime }$ and Nvt+1$N_{v_{t-\ell +1}}^{\prime }$. A minor modification of [13, Corollary 2.5] gives precisely this. Namely, it shows that there exists a vertex vNv1$v \in N_{v_1}^{\prime }$ such that, for all but ε|Nv+1|$\varepsilon |N_{v_{\ell +1}}^{\prime }|$ vertices wNv+1$w \in N_{v_{\ell +1}}^{\prime }$, there exists a path from v$v$ to w$w$ (in G$G$) with one vertex in each of Nv2,,Nv$N_{v_2}^{\prime }, \ldots\,, N_{v_\ell }^{\prime }$ and similarly for Nvt+1$N_{v_{t-\ell +1}...…”
Section: Trees and Cycles Through Prescribed Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… There are several ways to improve the bound for f(H,q) in the proof of Theorem 1. In particular, one can use the constructions of Ramsey graphs for subdivisions given in [5,9] as a seed for our proof. In addition, it is possible to take k=normalΔ(Γ), where normalΓ is the Ramsey graph used, and M=2E(Γ)+f1(q,k).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%