2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-1956-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The SITLESS project: exercise referral schemes enhanced by self-management strategies to battle sedentary behaviour in older adults: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: BackgroundOlder adults are the fastest growing segment of the world‘s population. Recent evidence indicates that excessive sitting time is harmful to health, independent of meeting the recommended moderate to vigorous physical activity (PA) guidelines. The SITLESS project aims to determine whether exercise referral schemes (ERS) can be enhanced by self-management strategies (SMSs) to reduce sedentary behaviour (SB), increase PA and improve health, quality of life and function in the long term, as well as psych… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This cross‐sectional analysis is based on baseline data available from the SITLESS study, which is a prospective trial of community‐dwelling men and women aged ≥65 years from Denmark, Spain, Germany, and Northern Ireland 25 . Participants were eligible if they were able to walk for ≥2 minutes (with or without a walking aid), scored four or above on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), reported undertaking regular MVPA ≤30 minutes on 5 days per week, and/or spend 6‐8 hours per day sitting (eg, watching TV or working at the computer).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cross‐sectional analysis is based on baseline data available from the SITLESS study, which is a prospective trial of community‐dwelling men and women aged ≥65 years from Denmark, Spain, Germany, and Northern Ireland 25 . Participants were eligible if they were able to walk for ≥2 minutes (with or without a walking aid), scored four or above on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), reported undertaking regular MVPA ≤30 minutes on 5 days per week, and/or spend 6‐8 hours per day sitting (eg, watching TV or working at the computer).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research described in this review covers the theoretical basis and empirical evidence for establishing a green-outdoors bent to social prescribing, which includes reviews of park prescription programs [46], group hiking prescriptions [47], farmers' market prescriptions [48], "Walk with a Doc" programs (https://walkwithadoc.org/), and exercise referral programs [49][50][51]. These social prescriptions take various forms, such as referrals for high-risk patients to weekly, biweekly, or monthly guided outdoor activities with provided transportation [44••, 47], or open-ended, digitally supported prescriptions outlining expected duration, intensity, and frequency of outdoor physical activity [24•].…”
Section: Social Prescribing As a Path Towards Addressing Community Somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects are often short-lived [51]. However, the use of social prescribing with enhanced selfmanagement strategies (e.g., individual goal setting, self-monitoring, prompts and cues) have the potential to strengthen the impact of such measures in fostering physical activity behavior change, and in turn, affect mood and feelings of connection if the activities are done within a group context [49,50]. Moreover, these strategies can be linked with nature-based solutions, promoting access to social and natural settings and open spaces [83].…”
Section: Intrapersonal Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated sample size to assess overall effectiveness of the intervention in the clinical trial is 1338 subjects (distributed in three intervention groups of 446 participants). 28 This sample size will ensure that it is possible to detect a clinically relevant increase of 30 daily counts per minute (CPM) between the ERS-SMS and the control groups or between the ERS-SMS and the ERS groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%