2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0007114508006557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The single nucleotide polymorphism upstream of insulin-induced gene 2 (INSIG2) is associated with the prevalence of hypercholesterolaemia, but not with obesity, in Japanese American women

Abstract: Insulin-induced gene 2 (insig-2) protein is known to play important roles in cholesterol and TAG metabolism both in vivo and in vitro. One particularly interesting single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), rs7566605, located 10 kb upstream of INSIG2 was reported to have the strongest association with obesity among 86 604 SNP, while the relationship with dyslipidaemia is uncertain. Eight hundred and eighty-five Japanese Americans (347 men and 538 women) and 378 Japanese (182 men and 196 women) were enrolled, and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine whether there was an interaction between INSIG1 and INSIG2 , as suggested from mouse knockout studies, we fi rst examined the relationship between the family specifi c LOD scores for TG at the two loci ( 40 ). Second, we genotyped two SNPs in INSIG2 (rs7566605 and rs2422166) that had been reported to be associated with BMI and LDL-C in other studies (41)(42)(43) and tested for both main effects and interaction effects using the measured genotype analysis in SOLAR. Third, we examined the impact of INSIG1 variants conditional on INSIG2 variants.…”
Section: Meta-analysis Of Both Cohortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To determine whether there was an interaction between INSIG1 and INSIG2 , as suggested from mouse knockout studies, we fi rst examined the relationship between the family specifi c LOD scores for TG at the two loci ( 40 ). Second, we genotyped two SNPs in INSIG2 (rs7566605 and rs2422166) that had been reported to be associated with BMI and LDL-C in other studies (41)(42)(43) and tested for both main effects and interaction effects using the measured genotype analysis in SOLAR. Third, we examined the impact of INSIG1 variants conditional on INSIG2 variants.…”
Section: Meta-analysis Of Both Cohortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, while INSIG1 is involved in the feedback regulation of lipid synthesis, INSIG2 has been shown to be associated with obesity and adipocyte metabolism in a number of recent studies (41)(42)(43). However, no study to date has addressed whether these two genes work cooperatively in humans to affect lipid levels, as has been shown in mice ( 26 ).…”
Section: Interaction Between Insig1 and Insig2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They subsequently obtained the same result in four other cohorts while in a fifth sample, the confidence interval for the OR for obesity was not significant. It is intriguing, then, that most studies initiated afterward in different population samples found no evidence to support the claim by Herbert et al Indeed, rs7566605 was significantly associated with BMI in a Chinese subpopulation and with morbid obesity in a Japanese population, while 10 other reports were negative [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]33]. Lyon et al [46], in a large multi-ethnic study, did find an association in five cohorts but could not confirm the association in three other cohorts, while the combined analysis was also significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…elevated body mass index (BMI), a polymorphic variant upstream of the INSIG2 gene (insulin-induced gene 2) on chromosome 2 was identified for the first time [18], although mouse and human linkage studies had already identified INSIG2 as an obesity QTL [19,20]. Despite successful replication by Herbert et al of their finding in four out of five samples from different populations [18], subsequent studies have yielded only negative results [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%