1994
DOI: 10.1109/26.275293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The single burst error detection performance of binary cyclic codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
5

Year Published

1994
1994
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…To start the background we give a roll-call of some of the significant contributors: Euclid (Elements text book and an algorithm bearing his name), Abel (insolvability of the quintic equation by radicals), Galois (solvability of primitive equation by radicals), Reimann (non-euclidean metrics), Clebsch (algebraic geometry), Boole (logic), Boltzman (entropy), Gibbs (entropy), Von Neuman (entropy), Nyquist (sampling), Hartley (counting messages), Shannon (channel capacity), Hamming (Hamming codes) [5], Reed (RM & RS codes) [7], Muller (RM codes), Solomon (RS codes) [7], Prange (cyclic codes), Fire (Fire codes), Bose (BCH codes), Roy-Chaudhuri (BCH codes), Hocquemghem (BCH codes), Peterson (text books) [11], Slepian (bounds) [8], Wolf (bounds) [10,12,13]], Gilbert (bounds), Berlekamp (algebra) [13,14], Elias (bounds), MacWilliams (weight enumerators) [15], and Fujiwara (bounds) [16,17], among many others of significance. Reviewing the work of these contributors will reveal their input to the subsequent development and improvement of error control techniques.…”
Section: History/background/foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To start the background we give a roll-call of some of the significant contributors: Euclid (Elements text book and an algorithm bearing his name), Abel (insolvability of the quintic equation by radicals), Galois (solvability of primitive equation by radicals), Reimann (non-euclidean metrics), Clebsch (algebraic geometry), Boole (logic), Boltzman (entropy), Gibbs (entropy), Von Neuman (entropy), Nyquist (sampling), Hartley (counting messages), Shannon (channel capacity), Hamming (Hamming codes) [5], Reed (RM & RS codes) [7], Muller (RM codes), Solomon (RS codes) [7], Prange (cyclic codes), Fire (Fire codes), Bose (BCH codes), Roy-Chaudhuri (BCH codes), Hocquemghem (BCH codes), Peterson (text books) [11], Slepian (bounds) [8], Wolf (bounds) [10,12,13]], Gilbert (bounds), Berlekamp (algebra) [13,14], Elias (bounds), MacWilliams (weight enumerators) [15], and Fujiwara (bounds) [16,17], among many others of significance. Reviewing the work of these contributors will reveal their input to the subsequent development and improvement of error control techniques.…”
Section: History/background/foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vários autores definem o erro em surto como sendo um padrão de erro que afeta b bits, onde o padrão de erro começa e termina com um valor diferente de zero [20][19] [6]. Neste trabalho adotamos o modelo de surto de Wolf e Chun [21] (b:p), onde os erros ocorrem randomicamente dentro de um intervalo de b bits, com uma probabilidade p de erro de cada bit. Os códigos estudados em [21] foram os CRCs, e para eles o valor de p = 0,5, era considerado o pior caso.…”
Section: Metodologiaunclassified
“…Neste trabalho adotamos o modelo de surto de Wolf e Chun [21] (b:p), onde os erros ocorrem randomicamente dentro de um intervalo de b bits, com uma probabilidade p de erro de cada bit. Os códigos estudados em [21] foram os CRCs, e para eles o valor de p = 0,5, era considerado o pior caso. Com esta nova definição de surto, onde p pode ser diferente de 0,5, para um determinado b podem existir valores de p, diferentes de 0,5 que maximizam a Pue do surto (b:p).…”
Section: Metodologiaunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For p=0.5, which used to be considered the worst case, it is well known [Wolf94J] that the probability of undetected one burst error of length b <= r is 0, of length b=r+1 is 2^-(r-1), and of b > r+1, is 2^-r, independently of the choice of the primitive polynomial.…”
Section: Background and Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%