2007
DOI: 10.1253/circj.71.1593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Simultaneous Assessment of Aortic Valve Area and Coronary Artery Stenosis Using 16-Slice Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography in Patients With Aortic StenosisComparison With Echocardiography

Abstract: he method of 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (16-slice MDCT) has recently been introduced for the non-invasive visualization of arteriosclerotic coronary arteries, abnormal cardiac structures and myocardial properties. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Single-center studies have reported sensitivities between 72% and 95% and specificities between 86% and 97% for the detection of obstructive coronary lesions using 16-slice MDCT. 1-4 Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) is a promising non-invasive tec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After exclusion of duplicates, the systematic review retrieved 9,379 potentially relevant papers that were screened according to title or abstract for possible inclusion ( Figure 1). Thirty-four full-text reports were selected for further evaluation, from which 17 studies were excluded for the following reasons: no systematic ICA was performed (9 papers)-it was either completely absent (31,32) or was used only to confirm abnormal and/or nondiagnostic CTA findings (33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39); data to calculate diagnostic accuracies were not provided or could not be derived (4 papers) (40)(41)(42)(43); no reference to valve surgery was present (1 paper) (43); and a heterogeneous patient population inclusive of patients without VHD was included (4 papers) (44)(45)(46)(47) or no values for true-positive and false-negative observations were reported (i.e., variance is infinite and CIs as well as sensitivity could not be computed) (2 papers) (44,45). Seventeen studies were included in the final analysis ( years; 61% male) at least a 64-slice CTA was used (4,7,8,10,11,13,14,(18)(19)(20), whereas 7 studies evaluated 16-or 40-slice CTA in a total of 392 patients (mean age 68.0 AE 3.1 years; 59% male) (5,6,9,12,(15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After exclusion of duplicates, the systematic review retrieved 9,379 potentially relevant papers that were screened according to title or abstract for possible inclusion ( Figure 1). Thirty-four full-text reports were selected for further evaluation, from which 17 studies were excluded for the following reasons: no systematic ICA was performed (9 papers)-it was either completely absent (31,32) or was used only to confirm abnormal and/or nondiagnostic CTA findings (33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39); data to calculate diagnostic accuracies were not provided or could not be derived (4 papers) (40)(41)(42)(43); no reference to valve surgery was present (1 paper) (43); and a heterogeneous patient population inclusive of patients without VHD was included (4 papers) (44)(45)(46)(47) or no values for true-positive and false-negative observations were reported (i.e., variance is infinite and CIs as well as sensitivity could not be computed) (2 papers) (44,45). Seventeen studies were included in the final analysis ( years; 61% male) at least a 64-slice CTA was used (4,7,8,10,11,13,14,(18)(19)(20), whereas 7 studies evaluated 16-or 40-slice CTA in a total of 392 patients (mean age 68.0 AE 3.1 years; 59% male) (5,6,9,12,(15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beta-blocker use prior to MDCT was also identified in 8 of 9 studies. One study did not identify whether study subjects used BBlockers prior to study [24].…”
Section: Data Synthesis and Statistical Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, clinical study suggests that all measurable increase of pressure occurs within the ascending aorta. 24,25 Therefore, the measurement technique used in this study should reflect pressure recovery to a great extent.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%