1965
DOI: 10.1287/opre.13.5.689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Simulation of Hospital Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature has very few examples of such studies. Surprisingly, though, Fetter and Thompson (1965) is a very early example of DES that reports a whole hospital simulation, with a special interest in maternity processes. The aim of this work was to give a decision support tool to hospital administrations to predict the consequences of design changes and alternative policies.…”
Section: Whole Hospital Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature has very few examples of such studies. Surprisingly, though, Fetter and Thompson (1965) is a very early example of DES that reports a whole hospital simulation, with a special interest in maternity processes. The aim of this work was to give a decision support tool to hospital administrations to predict the consequences of design changes and alternative policies.…”
Section: Whole Hospital Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be argued that at the core of these concerns is the scheduling of patient appointments, with much research available on systems to aid appointment scheduling (Fetter and Thompson, 1965;Kuljis, Paul and Chen, 2001;Harper and Gamlin, 2003;Gunal and Pidd, 2010). It can be difficult to successfully balance utilisation and satisfaction if the patient scheduling is not optimised for the current clinic setup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods: computer simulation [12,178,333,390,417,496], heuristics [333], Markov processes [390], queueing theory [419,535].…”
Section: Tactical Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References differ in the extent in which various aspects are incorporated in the applied models. Frequently modeled aspects that influence the performance of an appointment schedule are patient punctuality [178,323,518], patients not showing up ('no-shows') [178,179,255,283], walk-in patients or urgent patients [12,178,417,535], doctor lateness at the start of a consultation session [178,179,332,421], doctor interruptions (e.g., by comfort breaks or administration) [179,323], and the variance of consultation duration [254]. These factors can be taken into account when modeling the following key decisions that together design an appointment schedule.…”
Section: Tactical Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation