The simplex in pair comparisons

Bloxom, Bruce

doi:10.1007/bf02306770

Cited by 14 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The second illustration is taken from Bloxom (1972), dealing with a version of the classical Thurstonian theory for modeling "greater-less" discrimination probabilities (section 4). Again, the notation is modified to better suit our purposes.…”

Section: Two Illustrationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selective influence through conditional independence

Dzhafarov

2003

Psychometrika

126

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Two Illustrationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selective influence through conditional independence

Dzhafarov

2003

Psychometrika

126

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bloxom (1972) and Arbuckle and Nugent (1973) are seminal contributions, introducing common factor models in the pair-comparisons literature. Probit versions for rankings, with the restriction ⌿ (1) = I, have been discussed in a series of papers (Böckenholt, 1993;Brady, 1989;Chan & Bentler, 1998).…”

Section: Random Coefficient Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multilevel logistic regression for polytomous data and rankings

2003

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We propose a unifying framework for multilevel modeling of polytomous data and rankings, accommodating dependence induced by factor and/or random coefficient structures at different levels. The framework subsumes a wide range of models proposed in disparate methodological literatures. Partial and tied rankings, alternative specific explanatory variables and alternative sets varying across units are handled. The problem of identification is addressed. We develop an estimation and prediction methodology for the model framework which is implemented in the generally available gllamm software. The methodology is applied to party choice and rankings from the 1987-1992 panel of the British Election Study. Three levels are considered: elections, voters and constituencies.

show abstract

“…Similar data were not provided for the FIRO-BC; moreover, the manual was criticized for not including reliability data on the additional scale scores that were reported (Bloxom, 1972;Gilligan, 1973). Subsequently, though the manual suggests that personality interpretations and behavioral predictions can be made from composite and difference scores, it provides no reliability data to support such interpretations.…”

mentioning

confidence: 94%

“…The FIRO-Behavior for Children (FIRO-BC) questionnaire has been regarded as experimental and unsuitable for use in systematic research until further data were reported (Bloxom, 1972). The revised FIRO manual (Schutz, 1978), however, again reported a minimum of data on the FIRO-BC questionnaire.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%