2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Simple View of Reading in Italian beginner readers: Converging evidence and open debates on the role of the main components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to reading decoding, our results fit with those reported by Florit and collaborators that reading speed/fluency measures significantly contributed to reading comprehension at least in first graders ( Florit et al, 2020 ) and third graders ( Florit et al, 2008 ); they are at variance with those of other studies which failed to detect any predictive role of reading fluency ( Tobia and Bonifacci, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With regard to reading decoding, our results fit with those reported by Florit and collaborators that reading speed/fluency measures significantly contributed to reading comprehension at least in first graders ( Florit et al, 2020 ) and third graders ( Florit et al, 2008 ); they are at variance with those of other studies which failed to detect any predictive role of reading fluency ( Tobia and Bonifacci, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…First, the studies included different measures of word recognition, reading comprehension and listening comprehension. As to the different reading measures, Tobia and Bonifacci (2015) and Florit et al (2020) created two separate latent variables, i.e., one for reading accuracy and the other for reading fluency, based on different accuracy and fluency measures (non-word and word accuracy vs fluency in Florit et al’s study; text reading accuracy vs fluency in Tobia and Bonifacci’s study) while Roch and Levorato (2009) included only measures of reading accuracy for non-words and reading speed for words. In the present study, we considered reading speed and accuracy in reading a meaningful text (rather than pseudoword decoding), a more functional and ecologically valid task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estudios realizados en lenguas más transparentes que el inglés han señalado que la medida de reconocimiento de palabras podría tener un impacto menor en lectores iniciales, dada la transparencia del sistema ortográfico (Caravolas et al, 2019). Sin embargo, estudios realizados en italiano, una lengua casi tan transparente como el español (Dehaene, 2015), llamaron la atención sobre un factor adicional que podría estar incidiendo en la contribución de la medida de lectura de palabras en la comprensión de textos: la forma en que se mide la lectura de palabras (atendiendo a la velocidad en la lectura o a la precisión) (Florit et al, 2020;Florit & Cain, 2011). En estos estudios se observó que la medida de comprensión oral realizaba una contribución mayor sobre la comprensión lectora cuando se tomaba en cuenta la medida de precisión en la lectura de palabras.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Sin embargo, estos estudios también señalan que, la relativa contribución de los dos componentes principales implicados en la comprensión lectora, se encontrarían afectados por un factor adicional, esto es, si la habilidad de decodificación de palabras es medida en términos de precisión o de velocidad en la lectura (Florit, Roch, Dicataldo, & Levorato, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified