2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2013.08.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The similarity of weights on edges and discovering of community structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Process of Our Method As a real example, we apply our method to a collaboration network of teachers in a university [20]. The network has 152 nodes and each node represents a research member.…”
Section: B a Collaboration Network To Show The Implementionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Process of Our Method As a real example, we apply our method to a collaboration network of teachers in a university [20]. The network has 152 nodes and each node represents a research member.…”
Section: B a Collaboration Network To Show The Implementionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newman defined weighted communities as groups of nodes where the weights on the edges are relatively larger than the external weights between them, and proposed a weighted modularity denoted w Q [18]. Recently, several algorithms have been proposed based on optimizing w Q [18], such as the WGN algorithm [18], the WEO algorithm [19], [20], the random walk-based method [21], etc. The WGN algorithm is generalized from its unweighted version GN algorithm [5] by calculating the weighted edge betweenness [18], and the WEO algorithm is generalized from its unweighted version EO algorithm [19] by using w Q [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LFR networks have heterogeneous degree distributions and community sizes, and allow communities to overlap, which are in accordance with the features of real networks, and have been widely used for testing the community detection methods in recent years. [5,[23][24][25][26] The adjustable topology parameters for the LFR benchmark networks are network size N, average degrees k , maximum degrees k max , minimum and maximum community size c min and c max , the degree distributions γ, the community size distributions β , the mixing parameter µ, the number of communities each overlapping node belongs to o m , and the number of overlapping nodes o n . [22] In order to detect the overlapping communities and nodes and make comparisons with other wellknown fuzzy overlapping community detection methods, such as Fuzzyclust [27] and NMF, [17] we first investigate our method on the LFR networks without overlapping nodes to compare with the existing local methods in the detection of disjoint communities.…”
Section: Lfr Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In real society, the interactions between individuals are of different strengths for many complex networks, which are called weighted networks. [2,34] For instance, in the air traffic network, the weight of a link is measured by the number of passengers in the related flight. In the router-level of the Internet, the weights of links are generally correlated with the bandwidth of the physical connections or the cost for data transmission between routers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%