2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-014-0361-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sim-SEQ Project: Comparison of Selected Flow Models for the S-3 Site

Abstract: Sim-SEQ is an international initiative on model comparison for geologic carbon sequestration, with an objective to understand and, if possible, quantify model uncertainties. Model comparison efforts in Sim-SEQ are at present focusing on one specific field test site, hereafter referred to as the Sim-SEQ Study site (or S-3 site). Within Sim-SEQ, different modeling teams are developing conceptual models of CO 2 injection at the S-3 site. In this paper, we select five flow models of the S-3 site and provide a qual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(30 reference statements)
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…used high‐resolution characterization of CO 2 plumes using cross‐well seismic tomography, and reported a 30 m distance between F2 and F3. Similar distances were also used in the Sim‐SEQ project . Carrigan et al .…”
Section: Modeling Methods and Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…used high‐resolution characterization of CO 2 plumes using cross‐well seismic tomography, and reported a 30 m distance between F2 and F3. Similar distances were also used in the Sim‐SEQ project . Carrigan et al .…”
Section: Modeling Methods and Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Together, these simulation tools provided a more accurate match with both the observed pressure response and the CO 2 breakthrough times in two observation wells, F2 and F3, as compared to prior simulation studies for Cranfield. Earlier studies had mostly relied on upscaled petrophysical properties (e.g., permeability and porosity) and relatively coarse grids, and were conducted using, e.g., CMG, IPARS, iTOUGH2, TOUGH2/EOS7C, STOMP‐CO2e, TOUGH2‐MP/ECO2N, VESA, and MoReS . In Soltanian et al ., we also performed extensive parameter studies to investigate the relative importance of capillarity, Fickian diffusion, relative permeability, and sedimentary architecture (e.g., fluvial channel) effects and found that flow was highly advection dominated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the five teams reported in Mukhopadhyay et al . [] four used fully coupled three‐dimensional simulators and one team used a vertically integrated simulator. As would be expected, the discretization of the domain and representation of physical processes such as relative permeability varied widely among the different models.…”
Section: Practical Models and Their Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original permeability and porosity distribution is from previously published studies . High permeability channels in the lower Tuscaloosa Formation at Cranfield have been mapped and confirmed by various fluid‐flow responses . However, the geometry of high permeability channels throughout the field is based on probabilistic extrapolation of the available data.…”
Section: Modeling Methods and Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%