The silent killer in media stories: Representations of hypertension as health risk factor in French-language Canadian newspapers

Abstract

The media is recognised as an increasingly important source of information about health risk and disease for non-professionals. The issue for public health actors is the accuracy and objectivity of such information. But the media do not neutrally transmit expert information on health risk; they also contribute to shaping it. Media studies show that the media have their own modus operandi and produce content that satisfies the criteria of newsworthiness and media-value. The objective of our research was to analyse how newspapers represent hypertension as a health risk factor, to examine how these representations relate to media-value characteristics, and to reveal differences between serious, popular, and tabloid newspapers. Our findings show that, in their coverage of hypertension, the newspapers we analysed accentuate features that come closest to media-value characteristics of health risk. The magnitude and undetectable nature of hypertension, and the severity and unpredictability of its consequences, are accentuated in media discourse through various rhetorical devices. Exacerbation of fear is most prevalent in the tabloid newspapers, with more use of scary metaphors and personifications.

Radio Sensors and Electric Storms: Scientific Metaphors in Media Talks

“…Studies of metaphor use in science news reporting showed that journalists often borrow the metaphors that researchers use to describe their research or expert advice (Collin & Hughes, 2011;Stelmach & Nerlich, 2015). However, the findings here suggest that scientists insert their metaphors in ways that align with the interactional environment in which these are used.…”

“…While journalists have been shown to borrow the metaphors that researchers use to describe their research or expert advice (Collin & Hughes, 2011, Stelmach & Nerlich, 2015, the findings here suggest that scientists insert their metaphors in ways that align with the interactional environment in which these are used. The scientists seemed to minimize their repair of the metaphors that the journalists proposed, and preferred instead to incorporate these terms into the explanations they delivered.…”

Interactional Alarms: Experts’ Framing of Health Risks in Live Broadcast News Interviews

“…Journalists have been shown to select quantity formulations (e.g. percentage or precise number), and attribute precision or uncertainty to emphasize the magnitude and severity of syndromes or predict their dangerous rise (Potter et al, 1991;Amberg & Hall, 2010;Collin & Hughes, 2011). This study shows how these and similar forms are captured by experts as opportunities to frame or reframe the risk discussed or items for which they are interviewed.…”

In their words: How television and visual media can raise awareness of dementia and other health conditions that carry stigma, including disabilities

“…( 1999: 260) Thus, it is widely accepted that knowledge and understanding about diseases (such as dementia), and the people that are affected by them, are socially constructed and influenced by the common discourse used and disseminated by the media (Clarke 2006;Collin and Hughes 2011;Lyons 2000;Seale 2002;Williamson et al 2011). Lyons (2000) suggests that the way that people behave with regards to their own, and others' health, is affected by the 'dominant constructions' of health and illness in the media.…”