Cardiac Pacing 1976
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-66356-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Significance of the Sinus Node Recovery Time in the Sick Sinus Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1). The electrophysiological indicators SNRT and CSNRT are also commonly used to assess the function of the SAN [24][25][26][27]. The SNRT increased from 412 ± 32 ms in the young group to 620 ± 56 ms in the adult group and to 838 ± 120 ms in the aged group (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05 Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1). The electrophysiological indicators SNRT and CSNRT are also commonly used to assess the function of the SAN [24][25][26][27]. The SNRT increased from 412 ± 32 ms in the young group to 620 ± 56 ms in the adult group and to 838 ± 120 ms in the aged group (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05 Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sinus node typically recovers with progressive decrease in cycle length over five-10 -pacing sequences were analysed d manner for our laboratory, 3. The response to incremental high right atrial was commenced at a rate just inherent sinus rate and progressively imrepsed by 10 Ventricular irritability assessed using programmed single and paired ventricular extrastimuli during sinus rhythm, and after a train of eight paced beats at both 100 bpm and 130 bpm. The extrastimulus was advanced in 10 ms decrements until ventricular refractoriness was encountered.…”
Section: Indcand Of Sinus Node Automaticity and Sinoatrial Ctionmentioning
confidence: 99%