2018
DOI: 10.1111/anec.12580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The significance of ST‐elevation in aVL in anterolateral myocardial infarction: An assessment by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: Patients with anterior STEMI and concomitant STE in aVL have less MaR in the apical inferior segment and more MaR in the basal anterior segment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have already pointed out the relative competition between the reciprocal changes of ST-depression in the inferior leads induced by LAD lesions proximal to the first diagonal branch, and inferior ST-elevation accompanying wrap-around LAD artery. 23,24 When we retrospectively reviewed the incidence of this variant in segment 6 patients, an occurrence of about 19% was observed. This observation is further supported by showing the prevalence of ST-elevation in the inferior leads to be as much as 13% higher in segment 7, compared with segment 6 patients, being ‘unopposed’ by the first diagonal driven lateral ST elevations since the diagonal artery is spared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have already pointed out the relative competition between the reciprocal changes of ST-depression in the inferior leads induced by LAD lesions proximal to the first diagonal branch, and inferior ST-elevation accompanying wrap-around LAD artery. 23,24 When we retrospectively reviewed the incidence of this variant in segment 6 patients, an occurrence of about 19% was observed. This observation is further supported by showing the prevalence of ST-elevation in the inferior leads to be as much as 13% higher in segment 7, compared with segment 6 patients, being ‘unopposed’ by the first diagonal driven lateral ST elevations since the diagonal artery is spared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is thought to be a result of the ischemia at the inferior wall due to the occlusion of a wrapped LAD that canceled the ST‐segment elevation in lateral leads as suggested by Sasaki et al (). Allencherril et al () reported that the concomitant apical inferior ischemia attenuated ST elevation in lead aVL using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The present study referred to the report by Sasaki et al (), and their report had a great contribution to establish our diagnostic flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, proximal LAD occlusion frequently displays ST-segment elevation in leads V 1 to V 4 and ST-segment depression in V 5 and V 6 , due to a ST vector directed to dominant basal segments, which is incorrectly classified as "anteroseptal" MI in the older scheme (Allencherril et al, 2018a(Allencherril et al, , 2018bBandeali et al, 2012;Bayés de Luna, 2012;Huang, Tran, Jneid, Wilson, & Birnbaum, 2011 be misinterpreted as small infarcts caused by distal occlusion of a short LAD (Sasaki et al, 2001). For example, a distal LAD occlusion or an occlusion proximal to D1 generally causes ST-vector to be directed anterolaterally, which results in ST-segment elevation in leads V 1 through V 6 .…”
Section: Anterolateral (Ste V 2 -V 6 ) (N = 14)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, ECG is labeled as "extensive anterior" MI by the older scheme, but instead, the occluded coronary network deprives apical or anterolateral region of blood supply. On the contrary, proximal LAD occlusion frequently displays ST-segment elevation in leads V 1 to V 4 and ST-segment depression in V 5 and V 6 , due to a ST vector directed to dominant basal segments, which is incorrectly classified as "anteroseptal" MI in the older scheme (Allencherril et al, 2018a(Allencherril et al, , 2018bBandeali et al, 2012;Bayés de Luna, 2012;Huang, Tran, Jneid, Wilson, & Birnbaum, 2011). However, a complex interaction with reciprocal changes and be misinterpreted as small infarcts caused by distal occlusion of a short LAD (Sasaki et al, 2001).…”
Section: Proximal Lad Occlusion (N = 93)mentioning
confidence: 99%